Cited by 885Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Abundance Variations within Globular Clusters

Gratton, Raffaele, Sneden, Christopher, Carretta, Eugenio·2004·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

▪ Abstract Abundance variations within globular clusters (GCs), and of GC stars with respect to field stars, are important diagnostics of a variety of physical phenomena, related to the evolution of individual stars, mass transfer in binary systems, and chemical evolution in high density environments. The broad astrophysical implications of GCs as building blocks of our knowledge of the Universe make a full understanding of their history and evolution basic in a variety of astrophysical fields. We review the current status of the research in this field, comparing the abundances in GCs with those obtained for field stars, discussing in depth the evidence for H-burning at high temperatures in GC stars, describing the process of self-enrichment in GCs with particular reference to the case of the most massive Galactic GC (ω Cen), and discussing various classes of cluster stars with abundance anomalies. Whereas the overall pattern might appear very complex at first sight, exciting new scenarios are opening where the interplay between GC dynamical and chemical properties are closely linked with each other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.133945

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gratton, R., Sneden, C., & Carretta, E.
Affiliations
  • Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Osservatorio astronomico di Bologna (IT)
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2004-09-22
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
385-440
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2159752461
Cited by
885
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 59
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
globular clusters, chemical abundances, abundance variations, field stars, self-enrichment, Omega Centauri, abundance anomalies, binary mass transfer, chemical evolution, cluster dynamics, stellar evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review