The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stellar Population Diagnostics of Elliptical Galaxy Formation
Open accessAbstract
Major progress has been achieved in recent years in mapping the properties of passively-evolving, early-type galaxies (ETG) from the local universe all the way to redshift ∼2. Here, age and metallicity estimates for local cluster and field ETGs are reviewed as based on color-magnitude, color-σ, and fundamental plane relations, as well as on spectral-line indices diagnostics. The results of applying the same tools at high redshifts are then discussed, and their consistency with the low-redshift results is assessed. Most low- as well as high-redshift (z ∼ 1) observations consistently indicate (a) a formation redshift z ≳ 3 for the bulk of stars in cluster ETGs, with their counterparts in low-density environments being on average ∼1–2 Gyr younger, i.e., formed at z ≳ 1.5–2; (b) the duration of the major star-formation phase anticorrelates with galaxy mass, and the oldest stellar populations are found in the most massive galaxies. With increasing redshift there is evidence for a decrease in the number density of ETGs, especially of the less massive ones, whereas existing data appear to suggest that most of the most-massive ETGs were already fully assembled at z ∼ 1. Beyond this redshift, the space density of ETGs starts dropping significantly, and as ETGs disappear, a population of massive, strongly clustered, starburst galaxies progressively becomes more and more prominent, which makes them the likely progenitors to ETGs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
White, S. D. M., & Rees, M. J. (1978) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 · Cited by 3,919
Maraston, C. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x · Cited by 1,907 · cited 4×
“…by van der Wel et al. (2005b), who found ∆ln (M/LB) = −(1.46 ± 0.09)z and ∆ln (M/LK) = −(1.18 ± 0.1)z, which appears to be in agreement with the prediction of some models (Maraston 2005), but not of others (Bruzual & Charlot 2003), possibly owing to the different treatment of the AGB contribution.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Cited by
Moresco, M., Pozzetti, L., Cimatti, A., Jimenez, R., Maraston, C., Verde, L., Thomas, D., Citro, A., Tojeiro, R., & Wilkinson, D. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014 · Cited by 1,182
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Structure and Formation of Elliptical and Spheroidal Galaxies
Bender, R. (2016) · doi:10.15781/t28g8fm0v · Cited by 555
UV-extended E-MILES stellar population models: young components in massive early-type galaxies
Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., Röck, B., & Falcón-Barroso, J. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2231 · Cited by 518
Zoccali, M., Hill, V., Lecureur, A., Barbuy, B., Renzini, A., Minniti, D., Gómez, A., & Ortolani, S. (2008) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809394 · Cited by 346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Renzini, A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-192
- ISSN
- 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4282
- OpenAlex
- W2129824238
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stellar Population Diagnostics of Elliptical Galaxy Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092450
- The paper
- Renzini, A. (2006). Stellar Population Diagnostics of Elliptical Galaxy Formation. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.