The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Zinc Finger Domains: Hypotheses and Current Knowledge
Abstract
Many of the hypotheses are clearly correct that are based on the initial observation that TFIIIA has an approximately periodic structure with invariant pairs of cysteines and histidines apparently capable of coordinating metal ions. A startling number of other cDNA clones encode proteins that contain one or more sequences that match the zinc finger consensus, revealing that zinc finger proteins represent perhaps the largest class of DNA binding proteins in eukaryotes and that zinc finger protein-controlled gene expression may be a fundamental aspect of development as well as other processes. A great deal of progress has been made in elucidating the structure of single zinc finger domains. From knowledge of these structures, plausible and testable models can be developed for the complexes between zinc finger proteins and their DNA binding sites. Clearly, one of the most important challenges remaining in this area involves testing and extending these models. Structural data on such protein-nucleic acid complexes derived from NMR or crystallographic studies is tremendously valuable in this regard. Finally, an additional fundamental question is raised by the observation that this family and other important nucleic acid binding proteins contain zinc ions bound in small structural domains. Is zinc binding merely a useful structural strategy for generating domains involved in macromolecular interactions, or are zinc concentration fluctuations used in some manner to regulate gene expression? The biophysical data available to date certainly do not rule out this intriguing possibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zinc binding in proteins and solution: A simple but accurate nonbonded representation
Stote, R. H., & Karplus, M. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340230104 · Cited by 354
A20 Blocks Endothelial Cell Activation through a NF-κB-dependent Mechanism
Cooper, J. T., Stroka, D. M., Brostjan, C., Palmetshofer, A., Bach, F. H., & Ferran, C. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.30.18068 · Cited by 247
The current status of primary hepatocyte culture
Mitaka, T. (1998) · International Journal of Experimental Pathology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2613.1998.00083.x · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, J. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 405-421
- ISSN
- 0883-9182 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2174184943
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zinc Finger Domains: Hypotheses and Current Knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.002201
- The paper
- Berg, J. M. (1990). Zinc Finger Domains: Hypotheses and Current Knowledge. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.002201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.