The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Proteins and Proteomes by Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
▪ Abstract A decade after the discovery of electrospray and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), methods that finally allowed gentle ionization of large biomolecules, mass spectrometry has become a powerful tool in protein analysis and the key technology in the emerging field of proteomics. The success of mass spectrometry is driven both by innovative instrumentation designs, especially those operating on the time-of-flight or ion-trapping principles, and by large-scale biochemical strategies, which use mass spectrometry to detect the isolated proteins. Any human protein can now be identified directly from genome databases on the basis of minimal data derived by mass spectrometry. As has already happened in genomics, increased automation of sample handling, analysis, and the interpretation of results will generate an avalanche of qualitative and quantitative proteomic data. Protein-protein interactions can be analyzed directly by precipitation of a tagged bait followed by mass spectrometric identification of its binding partners. By these and similar strategies, entire protein complexes, signaling pathways, and whole organelles are being characterized. Posttranslational modifications remain difficult to analyze but are starting to yield to generic strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Self-citationQuantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Cited by
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Self-citationComparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions
von Mering, C., Krause, R., Snel, B., Cornell, M., Oliver, S. G., Fields, S., & Bork, P. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature750 · Cited by 2,365
Peng, J., Elias, J. E., Thoreen, C. C., Licklider, L. J., & Gygi, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr025556v · Cited by 1,647
Molecular Circuits of Resolution: Formation and Actions of Resolvins and Protectins
Bannenberg, G. L., Chiang, N., Ariel, A., Arita, M., Tjonahen, E., Gotlinger, K. H., Hong, S., & Serhan, C. N. (2005) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.4345 · Cited by 699
The Role of Mass Spectrometry in Structure Elucidation of Dynamic Protein Complexes
Sharon, M., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.061005.090816 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Mann, M., Hendrickson, R. C., & Pandey, A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 437-473
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- OpenAlex
- W2161574105
- Cited by
- 1,219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Proteins and Proteomes by Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.437
- The paper
- Mann, M., Hendrickson, R. C., & Pandey, A. (2001). Analysis of Proteins and Proteomes by Mass Spectrometry. Annual Review of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.