The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and Energetics of the Hydrogen-Bonded Backbone in Protein Folding
Abstract
We seek to understand the link between protein thermodynamics and protein structure in molecular detail. A classical approach to this problem involves assessing changes in protein stability resulting from added cosolvents. Under any given conditions, protein molecules in aqueous buffer are in equilibrium between unfolded and folded states, U(nfolded) [Formula: see text] N(ative). Addition of organic osmolytes, small uncharged compounds found throughout nature, shift this equilibrium. Urea, a denaturing osmolyte, shifts the equilibrium toward U; trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a protecting osmolyte, shifts the equilibrium toward N. Using the Tanford Transfer Model, the thermodynamic response to many such osmolytes has been dissected into groupwise free energy contributions. It is found that the energetics involving backbone hydrogen bonding controls these shifts in protein stability almost entirely, with osmolyte cosolvents simply dialing between solvent-backbone versus backbone-backbone hydrogen bonds, as a function of solvent quality. This reciprocal relationship establishes the essential link between protein thermodynamics and the protein's hydrogen-bonded backbone structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Principles of Polymer Chemistry.
Huggins, M. L. (1954) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01639a090 · Cited by 16,550
Principles of polymer chemistry
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2140 · Cited by 15,218
The nature of the chemical bond—1992
Pauling, L. (1992) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed069p519 · Cited by 13,218
Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains
Anfinsen, C. B. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · Cited by 7,096
Statistical mechanics of chain molecules
Flory, P. J., & Volkenstein, M. (1969) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.1969.360080514 · Cited by 6,427
The interpretation of protein structures: Estimation of static accessibility
Lee, B., & Richards, F. M. (1971) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x · Cited by 5,850
Some Factors in the Interpretation of Protein Denaturation
Kauzmann, W. (1959) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60608-7 · Cited by 4,870
Dominant forces in protein folding
Dill, K. A. (1990) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00483a001 · Cited by 3,800
Living with Water Stress: Evolution of Osmolyte Systems
Yancey, P. H., Clark, M. E., Hand, S. C., Bowlus, R. D., & Somero, G. N. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7112124 · Cited by 3,740
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolen, D. W., & Rose, G. D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 339-362
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- OpenAlex
- W2158127085
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and Energetics of the Hydrogen-Bonded Backbone in Protein Folding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.131357
- The paper
- Bolen, D. W., & Rose, G. D. (2008). Structure and Energetics of the Hydrogen-Bonded Backbone in Protein Folding. Annual Review of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.131357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.