The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer Simulations of Enzyme Catalysis: Methods, Progress, and Insights
Abstract
▪ Abstract Understanding the action of enzymes on an atomistic level is one of the important aims of modern biophysics. This review describes the state of the art in addressing this challenge by simulating enzymatic reactions. It considers different modeling methods including the empirical valence bond (EVB) and more standard molecular orbital quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods. The importance of proper configurational averaging of QM/MM energies is emphasized, pointing out that at present such averages are performed most effectively by the EVB method. It is clarified that all properly conducted simulation studies have identified electrostatic preorganization effects as the source of enzyme catalysis. It is argued that the ability to simulate enzymatic reactions also provides the chance to examine the importance of nonelectrostatic contributions and the validity of the corresponding proposals. In fact, simulation studies have indicated that prominent proposals such as desolvation, steric strain, near attack conformation, entropy traps, and coherent dynamics do not account for a major part of the catalytic power of enzymes. Finally, it is pointed out that although some of the issues are likely to remain controversial for some time, computer modeling approaches can provide a powerful tool for understanding enzyme catalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unified Approach for Molecular Dynamics and Density-Functional Theory
Car, R., & Parrinello, M. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2471 · Cited by 10,754
On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. I
Marcus, R. A. (1956) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1742723 · Cited by 6,081
Warshel, A., & Levitt, M. (1976) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(76)90311-9 · Cited by 4,479
Self-citationCatalysis in chemistry and enzymology
Jencks, W. P. (1969) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,217
A combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical potential for molecular dynamics simulations
Field, M. J., Bash, P. A., & Karplus, M. (1990) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540110605 · Cited by 2,466
Hybrid Models for Combined Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanical Approaches
Bakowies, D., & Thiel, W. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp9536514 · Cited by 1,261
Computer Modeling of Chemical Reactions in Enzymes and Solutions
Warshel, A. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,128
Self-citationDirect calculation of electron density in density-functional theory
Yang, W. (1991) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.1438 · Cited by 1,053
The Depth of Chemical Time and the Power of Enzymes as Catalysts
Wolfenden, R., & Snider, M. J. (2001) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000058i · Cited by 930
Molecular Architecture and \nBiological Reactions
Pauling, L. C. (1946) · CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) · Cited by 865
Cited by
P450 Enzymes: Their Structure, Reactivity, and Selectivity—Modeled by QM/MM Calculations
Shaik, S., Cohen, S., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Kumar, D., & Thiel, W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900121s · Cited by 1,083
Friesner, R. A., & Guallar, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094410 · Cited by 522
Brunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Mechanisms and Free Energies of Enzymatic Reactions
Gao, J., Ma, S., Major, D. T., Nam, K., Pu, J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050293k · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Warshel, A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 425-443
- ISSN
- 1056-8700 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4266
- OpenAlex
- W2136913776
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer Simulations of Enzyme Catalysis: Methods, Progress, and Insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141807
- The paper
- Warshel, A. (2003). Computer Simulations of Enzyme Catalysis: Methods, Progress, and Insights. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.