Cited by 358Cardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesMuscle Physiology and DisordersProtein Structure and Dynamics

THE MAMMALIAN MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN GENE FAMILY

Weiss, Allison, Leinwand, Leslie A.·1996·Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Abstract

▪ Abstract Myosin is a highly conserved, ubiquitous protein found in all eukaryotic cells, where it provides the motor function for diverse movements such as cytokinesis, phagocytosis, and muscle contraction. All myosins contain an amino-terminal motor/head domain and a carboxy-terminal tail domain. Due to the extensive number of different molecules identified to date, myosins have been divided into seven distinct classes based on the properties of the head domain. One such class, class II myosins, consists of the conventional two-headed myosins that form filaments and are composed of two myosin heavy chain (MYH) subunits and four myosin light chain subunits. The MYH subunit contains the ATPase activity providing energy that is the driving force for contractile processes mentioned above, and numerous MYH isoforms exist in vertebrates to carry out this function. The MYHs involved in striated muscle contraction in mammals are the focus of the current review. The genetics, molecular biology, and biochemical properties of mammalian MYHs are discussed below. MYH gene expression patterns in developing and adult striated muscles are described in detail, as are studies of regulation of MYH genes in the heart. The discovery that mutant MYH isoforms have a causal role in the human disease familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC) has implemented structure/function investigations of MYHs. The regulation of MYH genes expressed in skeletal muscle and the potential functional implications that distinct MYH isoforms may have on muscle physiology are addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.417

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high similarity in amino acid sequences between 2 human MyHC isoforms (93%) has been identified.

    “Supporting this, a high similarity in amino acid sequences between 2 human MyHC isoforms (93%) has been identified. 47,280,281”

    From Autoimmune Myocarditis, Old Dogs and New Tricks. (2024) · cites this paper as [281]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 358

Authors
Weiss, A., & Leinwand, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology
Published
1996-11
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
417-439
ISSN
  • 1081-0706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8995
OpenAlex
W2121466366
Cited by
358
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
myosin heavy chain, striated muscle contraction, skeletal muscle, heart, gene expression, gene expression regulation, familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, motor proteins, ATPase activity, muscle physiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Mammals, Mutation, Structure-Activity Relationship, Myosin Heavy Chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review