Endophenotypes in the Genetic Analyses of Mental Disorders
Abstract
Common mental disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe major depression are highly heritable, but differ from single-gene (Mendelian) diseases in that they are the end products of multiple causes. Although this fact may help explain their prevalence from an evolutionary perspective, the complexity of the causes of these disorders makes identification of disease-promoting genes much more difficult. The “endophenotype” approach is an alternative method for measuring phenotypic variation that may facilitate the identification of susceptibility genes for complexly inherited traits. Here we examine the endophenotype construct in context of psychiatric genetics. We first develop an evolutionary theoretical framework for common mental disorders and differentiate them from simpler, single-gene disorders. We then provide a definition and description of endophenotypes, elucidating several features that will make a proposed endophenotype useful in psychiatric genetic research and evaluating the methods for detecting and validating such endophenotypes. We conclude with a review of recent results in the schizophrenia literature that illustrate the usefulness of endophenotypes in genetic analyses of mental disorders, and discuss implications of these findings for models of disease causation and nosology. Given that in mental disorders as in behavior generally, the pathways from genotypes to phenotypes are circuitous at best, discernment of endophenotypes more proximal to the effects of genetic variation will aid attempts to link genes to disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Threshold-dependent models postulate that disease is more likely in individuals with extreme values of underlying endophenotypes.
“Threshold-dependent models77 postulate that disease is more likely to arise in individuals who have extreme values of underlying endophenotypes78,79.”
From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [78]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 399
- Authors
- Cannon, T. D., & Keller, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 267-290
- ISSN
- 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-5951
- OpenAlex
- W2116139029
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- endophenotypes, psychiatric genetics, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, multifactorial inheritance, heritability, susceptibility genes, genetic linkage, disease classification, genotype-phenotype correlation
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Chromosome Mapping, Family, Genetic Markers, Genetic Techniques, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Schizophrenia, Social Environment, Genetic Variation, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review