The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COSMIC DUST: COLLECTION AND RESEARCH
Abstract
The term as used here refers to particulate material that exists or has existed in the interplanetary medium as bodies smaller than 1 mm. The particles can be collected both in space and in the terrestrial environment, and they are a valuable resource of meteoritic material. The dust samples are complementary to the traditional meteorites that were much larger meteoroids in space. Because of their size, the analysis of collected dust particles is more difficult and limited than studies of meteorites. Nevertheless, collected dust samples are being vigorously investigated for two fundamentally important reasons. The first is that the most friable extraterrestrial materials can only be collected in the form of dust. Highly fragile materials cannot survive hyper velocity entry into the atmosphere in chunks as large as conventional meteorites. Most cometary meteoroids are known to be fragile, and dust collection is the only Earth based technique for obtaining typical cometary solids. The second reason why dust is important is that it is very abundant. Meteorites are exceedingly rare, but cosmic dust is so common that quite literally every footstep a person takes contacts a fragment of cosmic dust. Dust is so abundant that, with appropriate techniques, it can be recovered from historical deposits in deep-sea sediments and collected in real time in space and in the stratosphere. Stratigraphic layers in sediments record a continuous history of the terrestrial accretion of space debris that extends beyond 108 yr ago. This record can be searched for temporal changes in the meteoroid complex, such as might occur during fluctuations in the number of comets in the inner solar system or during passage of the solar system through an interstellar cloud. Effects of isolated events, such as the terrestrial impact of a large body, are also contained in sediments. The flux
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Draine, B. T. (2003) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 · Cited by 2,389
Chyba, C., & Sagan, C. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355125a0 · Cited by 1,321
Pre-biotic organic matter from comets and asteroids
Anders, E. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/342255a0 · Cited by 421
The Cassini Cosmic Dust Analyzer
Srama, R., Ahrens, T. J., Altobelli, N., Auer, S., Bradley, J. G., Burton, M., Dikarev, V. V., Economou, T., Fechtig, H., Görlich, M., et al. (2004) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-004-1435-z · Cited by 299
The classification of micrometeorites
Genge, M. J., Engrand, C., Gounelle, M., & Taylor, S. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00668.x · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Brownlee, D. E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1985-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-173
- ISSN
- 0084-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4495
- OpenAlex
- W2123494992
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COSMIC DUST: COLLECTION AND RESEARCH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ea.13.050185.001051
- The paper
- Brownlee, D. E. (1985). COSMIC DUST: COLLECTION AND RESEARCH. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.13.050185.001051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.