The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CRITICAL TAPER MODEL OF FOLD-AND-THRUST BELTS AND ACCRETIONARY WEDGES
Abstract
The fold-and-thrust belts and submarine accretionary wedges that lie along compressive plate boundaries are one of the best understood deformational features of the Earth's upper crust. Although there is considerable natural variation among the many fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges that have been recognized and explored, several features appear to be universal . In cross section, fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges occupy a wedge-shaped deformed region overlying a basal detachment or decollement fault; the rocks or sediments beneath this fault show very little deformation. The decollement fault characteristically dips toward the interior of the mountain belt or, in the case of a submarine wedge, toward the island arc; the topography, in contrast, slopes toward the toe or deformation front of the wedge. Deformation within the wedge is generally dominated by imbricate thrust faults verging toward the toe and related fault-bend folding. Two North American fold-and-thrust belts that exhibit these features are shown in Figure 1. Neither of these two examples is tectonically active today; the southern Canadian fold-and-thrust belt was active during the late Jurassic and Cretaceous (150-100 Ma), whereas the southern Appa lachians were deformed during the late Carboniferous to Permian Alle ghenian orogeny (300-250 Ma). Figure 2 shows two examples that are currently active: the Taiwan fold-and-thrust belt, produced by the sub duction of the Eurasian plate beneath the Philippine Sea plate (Suppe 1981 , 1987); and the Barbados accretionary wedge, produced by the sub-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stern, R. J. (2002) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2001rg000108 · Cited by 1,517
Dominguez, S., Malavieille, J., & Lallemand, S. E. (2000) · Tectonics · doi:10.1029/1999tc900055 · Cited by 301
The exhumation of the Indo-Burman Ranges, Myanmar
Najman, Y., Sobel, E. R., Millar, I., Stockli, D. F., Govin, G., Lisker, F., Garzanti, E., Limonta, M., Vezzoli, G., Copley, A., et al. (2020) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115948 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlen, F. A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-99
- ISSN
- 0084-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4495
- OpenAlex
- W2105425673
- Cited by
- 848
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CRITICAL TAPER MODEL OF FOLD-AND-THRUST BELTS AND ACCRETIONARY WEDGES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ea.18.050190.000415
- The paper
- Dahlen, F. A. (1990). CRITICAL TAPER MODEL OF FOLD-AND-THRUST BELTS AND ACCRETIONARY WEDGES. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.18.050190.000415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.