Cited by 342Planetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary ScienceGeological and Geochemical Analysis

EARLY CRUSTAL EVOLUTION OF MARS

Nimmo, Francis, Tanaka, Ken·2005·Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences

Abstract

▪ Abstract The bulk of the ∼50-km-thick Martian crust formed at ∼4.5 Gyr B.P., perhaps from a magma ocean. This crust is probably a basaltic andesite or andesite and is enriched in incompatible and heat-producing elements. Later additions of denser basalt to the crust were volumetrically minor, but resurfaced significant portions of the Northern hemisphere. A significant fraction of the total thickness of the crust was magnetized prior to 4 Gyr B.P., with the magnetization later selectively removed by large impacts. Early large impacts also modified the hemispheric contrast in crustal thickness (the dichotomy), which was possibly caused by long-wavelength mantle convection. Subsequent Noachian modification of the crust included further impacts, significant fluvial erosion, and volcanism associated with the formation of the Tharsis rise. Remaining outstanding questions include the origin of the dichotomy and the nature of the magnetic anomalies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mars' ancient crust is well-preserved, allowing a window to epochs as early as 3-4 Ga across large regions of the surface.

    “One of the happy outcomes of this is that its ancient crust is incredibly well-preserved, allowing a window to epochs as early as 3-4 Ga across large regions of the surface (Nimmo & Tanaka 2005).”

    From The Climate of Early Mars (2016) · cites this paper as Nimmo & Tanaka 2005

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 173 · Cited by 342

Authors
Nimmo, F., & Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
Published
2005-05-31
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
133-161
ISSN
  • 0084-6597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4495
OpenAlex
W2119685988
Cited by
342
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
Martian crust, crustal evolution, magma ocean, basaltic andesite, crustal magnetization, dichotomy, crustal thickness, mantle convection, Tharsis rise, volcanic activity, fluvial erosion, early Mars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review