The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns Of Tropical Vertebrate Frugivore Diversity
Abstract
The production of fleshy fruits by angiosperms and their consumption by a diverse array of vertebrates is a quintessential tropical phenomenon. Although fleshy fruits are produced by many kinds of plants in a latitudinally wide variety of habitats, this plant-animal mutualism is most common in the tropics. From 50% to over 90% of the species of tropical shrubs and trees, depending on habitat, rely on fruit-eating vertebrates to disperse their seeds (53). In many tropical forests, the bulk of the vertebrate biomass is supported by fleshy fruits. In tropical moist forest at Cocha Cashu, Peru, for example, frugivorous species made up 80% of the mammalian and avian biomass, according to Terborgh's estimates (117). Approximately 50% of the biomass of forest birds in central Panama is supported by fruit (131). A substantial portion of the increased diversity of tropical mammalian and avian faunas (compared with their temperate counterparts) results from the evolution of fruit-eating species (27, 61, 88). In this review, we examine patterns of vertebrate frugivore diversity in the tropics and discuss the evolutionary and ecological processes that lie behind these patterns. Three basic questions serve as the focus of this review: (a) Do parallel diversity trends exist in different taxonomic groups; (b) are diversity and other ecological trends the same in the Old and New World tropics; and (c) to what extent have historical vs ecological factors influenced these patterns?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Megagardeners of the forest – the role of elephants in seed dispersal
Campos-Arceiz, A., & Blake, S. (2011) · Acta Oecologica · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2011.01.014 · Cited by 384
Determinants of Variation in Tropical Forest Primate Biomass: New Evidence from West Africa
Oates, J. F., Whitesides, G. H., Davies, A. G., Waterman, P. G., Green, S. M., Dasilva, G. L., & Mole, S. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940272 · Cited by 334
Self-citationLife after logging: reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo
E., M., D., S., R., N., D., A., B., R., D., I., T., S., A., L., I., R., A., W., et al. (2005) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/001663 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, T.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1987-01-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-109
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2180429978
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns Of Tropical Vertebrate Frugivore Diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.18.1.91
- The paper
- Fleming, T. (1987). Patterns Of Tropical Vertebrate Frugivore Diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.18.1.91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.