Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Insect Mouthparts: Ascertaining the Paleobiology of Insect Feeding Strategies

Labandeira, Conrad C.·1997·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

One of the most intensively examined and abundantly documented structures in the animal world is insect mouthparts. Major structural types of extant insect mouthparts are extensive, consisting of diverse variations in element structure within each of the five mouthpart regions—labrum, hypopharynx, mandibles, maxillae, and labium. Numerous instances of multielement fusion both within and among mouthpart regions result in feeding organs capable of ingesting in diverse ways foods that are solid, particulate, and liquid in form. Mouthpart types have a retrievable and interpretable fossil history in well-preserved insect deposits. In addition, the trace-fossil record of insect-mediated plant damage, gut contents, coprolites, and insect-relevant floral features provides complementary data documenting the evolution of feeding strategies during the past 400 million years. From a cluster analysis of insect mouthparts, I recognize 34 fundamental mouthpart classes among extant insects and their geochronological evolution by a five-phase pattern. This pattern is characterized, early in the Devonian, by coarse partitioning of food by mandibulate and piercing-and-sucking mouthpart classes, followed by a rapid rise in herbivore mouthpart types for fluid- and solid-feeding during the Late Carboniferous and Early Permian. Mouthpart innovation during the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic added mouthpart classes for fluid and aquatic particle-feeding. This ecomorphological expansion of mouthpart design was associated with the radiation of holometabolous insects, especially Diptera. The final phase of mouthpart class expansion occurred during the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, with addition of surface-fluid-feeding mouthpart classes that subsequently became important during the ecological expansion of angiosperms. Conclusions about the evolution of mouthpart design are based on the mapping of phenetic mouthpart classes onto (ideally) cladistic phylogenies of lineages bearing those same mouthpart classes. The plotting of phenetic and associated ecological attributes onto baseline phylogenies is one of the most important uses of cladistic data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.153

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Labandeira, C. C.
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
1997-11
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
153-193
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143274225
Cited by
296
References
0
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insect Mouthparts: Ascertaining the Paleobiology of Insect Feeding Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.153
The paper
Labandeira, C. C. (1997). Insect Mouthparts: Ascertaining the Paleobiology of Insect Feeding Strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.153

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.