Echinoderm larvae and phylogeny
Abstract
New robust phylogenies for echinoderms, based on congruent patterns derived from multiple data sets, provide a sound foundation for plotting the evolution of life-history strategies and comparing rates and patterns of larval and adult morphological change. This approach demonstrates that larval morphology has been evolving independently of adult morphology, that larval morphology displays more homoplasy than adult morphology, and that early developmental patterns are remarkably flexible. Larval morphology on its own can mislead phylogenetic analysis, not because of lateral gene transfer among distantly related taxa, but because of massive convergence in the form of nonfeeding larvae brought about by the loss of complex structures and the strong functional constraints on feeding larvae. The degree to which larval tissue is resorbed at metamorphosis is believed to be important in determining adult body plan. Although the correspondence is not precise, it does provide a model for understanding skeletal homologies among the classes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The latest common ancestor of eleutherozoans (node E of Fig. 2) must have utilized maximal indirect development.
“Given that all other eleutherozoan groups (i.e., asteroids, ophiuroids, echinoids, and holothurians, which is to say all modern echinoderm groups except crinoids) also have primary larval stages, the latest common ancestor of eleutherozoans (Fig. 2, node E) must have utilized maximal indirect development as well (see also Smith, 1997;Nielsen, 1998).”
From Bilaterian Origins: Significance of New Experimental Observations (2000) · cites this paper as Smith, 1997
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Smith, A. B.
- Affiliations
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Andrew B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-241
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100836942
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Keywords
- echinoderm larvae, echinoderm phylogeny, larval morphology, homoplasy, morphological convergence, life history strategies, metamorphosis, developmental flexibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review