Cited by 95Echinoderm biology and ecologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Echinoderm larvae and phylogeny

Smith, Andrew B.·1997·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

New robust phylogenies for echinoderms, based on congruent patterns derived from multiple data sets, provide a sound foundation for plotting the evolution of life-history strategies and comparing rates and patterns of larval and adult morphological change. This approach demonstrates that larval morphology has been evolving independently of adult morphology, that larval morphology displays more homoplasy than adult morphology, and that early developmental patterns are remarkably flexible. Larval morphology on its own can mislead phylogenetic analysis, not because of lateral gene transfer among distantly related taxa, but because of massive convergence in the form of nonfeeding larvae brought about by the loss of complex structures and the strong functional constraints on feeding larvae. The degree to which larval tissue is resorbed at metamorphosis is believed to be important in determining adult body plan. Although the correspondence is not precise, it does provide a model for understanding skeletal homologies among the classes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The latest common ancestor of eleutherozoans (node E of Fig. 2) must have utilized maximal indirect development.

    “Given that all other eleutherozoan groups (i.e., asteroids, ophiuroids, echinoids, and holothurians, which is to say all modern echinoderm groups except crinoids) also have primary larval stages, the latest common ancestor of eleutherozoans (Fig. 2, node E) must have utilized maximal indirect development as well (see also Smith, 1997;Nielsen, 1998).”

    From Bilaterian Origins: Significance of New Experimental Observations (2000) · cites this paper as Smith, 1997

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 95

Authors
Smith, A. B.
Affiliations
Natural History Museum (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Andrew B.
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
1997-11
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
219-241
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100836942
Cited by
95
References
91
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Keywords
echinoderm larvae, echinoderm phylogeny, larval morphology, homoplasy, morphological convergence, life history strategies, metamorphosis, developmental flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review