Cited by 601Animal Ecology and Behavior StudiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAmphibian and Reptile Biology

THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE DEGRADATION OF ISLAND ECOSYSTEMS: A Case History of Guam

Fritts, Thomas H., Rodda, Gordon H.·1998·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

▪ Abstract The accidental introduction of the brown treesnake (Boiga irregularis) on Guam around 1950 induced a cascade of extirpations that may be unprecedented among historical extinction events in taxonomic scope and severity. Birds, bats, and reptiles were affected, and by 1990 most forested areas on Guam retained only three native vertebrates, all of which were small lizards. Of the hypotheses to account for the severity of this extinction event, we find some support for the importance of lack of coevolution between introduced predator and prey, availability of alternate prey, extraordinary predatory capabilities of the snake, and vulnerabilities of the Guam ecosystem. In addition, there were important interactions among these factors, especially the presence of introduced prey (possessing coevolutionary experience) that were thus able to maintain their populations and provide alternate prey to the introduced predator while it was driving the native prey species to extinction. This complex of vulnerabilities is common on oceanic islands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Introductions of non-native predators to islands without predators demonstrate that novel predators can greatly reduce native prey numbers and drive local extinctions.

    “The history of introductions of exotic predators to predator-free islands illustrates that novel predators can markedly reduce populations of native prey and cause local extinctions (Fritts & Rodda 1998;Knapp et al. 2001;Blackburn et al. 2004).”
  • The highly heterogeneous pattern of predation in this system suggests that economically and socially valuable ungulate populations will not suffer runaway predation as occurs with many exotic predator invasions.

    “The highly heterogeneous pattern of predation found in this system offers a measure of assurance that economically and socially valuable ungulate populations will not suffer runaway predation as occurs with many exotic predator invasions (Fritts & Rodda 1998;Knapp et al. 2001).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fritts, T. H., & Rodda, G. H.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
1998-11
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
113-140
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122640751
Cited by
601
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 28
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Keywords
brown tree snake, Boiga irregularis, introduced species, extinction cascades, Guam, birds, bats, reptiles, coevolution, alternative prey, introduced predators, oceanic islands, island biogeography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review