The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of Eastern Asian and Eastern North American Disjunct Distributions in Flowering Plants
Abstract
▪ Abstract The disjunct distributions of morphologically similar plants between eastern Asia and eastern North America have fascinated botanists and biogeographers since the Linnaean era. This biogeographic pattern is currently recognized by the disjunct distributions of some species, approximately 65 genera, and a few closely related genera in these two widely separated areas. Early workers treated many disjuncts as conspecific, but most were later recognized as intercontinental species pairs. Recent phylogenetic studies confirm affinities between many of the disjunct taxa but also indicate that the disjunct pairs of species are rarely each other's closest relatives. Instead, a pattern of further diversification of species on one or both continents is commonly found. Phylogenetic, molecular, geologic, and fossil data all support the hypothesis that the eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions are relicts of the maximum development of temperate forests in the northern hemisphere during the Tertiary. Fossil and geologic evidence supports multiple origins of this pattern in the Tertiary, with both the North Atlantic and the Bering land bridges involved. In many genera of flowering plants, current estimates of divergence times using molecular and fossil data suggest that the disjunct patterns were established during the Miocene. Morphological stasis, evidenced by the minimal morphological divergence of species after a long time of separation, must have occurred in some of the disjunct groups in the north temperate zone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.
ZUCKERKANDL, E., & PAULING, L. (1965) · Evolving Genes and Proteins · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6 · Cited by 3,020
Punctuated equilibrium comes of age
Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366223a0 · Cited by 957
Cited by
Tiffney, B. H., & Manchester, S. R. (2001) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/323880 · Cited by 649
PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF FLORIDIAN PLANT COMMUNITIES DEPENDS ON TAXONOMIC AND SPATIAL SCALE
Cavender-Bares, J., Keen, A., & Miles, B. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[109:psofpc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 579
Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: Evidence from Malpighiaceae
Davis, C. C., Bell, C. D., Mathews, S., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.102175899 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 421-455
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152569620
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of Eastern Asian and Eastern North American Disjunct Distributions in Flowering Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.421
- The paper
- Wen, J. (1999). Evolution of Eastern Asian and Eastern North American Disjunct Distributions in Flowering Plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.421
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.