Cited by 254Fish Ecology and Management StudiesConservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationMarine and fisheries research

The Pacific salmon wars: what science brings to the challenge of recovering species

Ruckelshaus, Mary H., Levin, Phil, Johnson, Jerald B., Kareiva, Peter M.·2002·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

▪ Abstract Politicians, scientists, government agencies, and the public are all engaged in recovery planning for Pacific salmon. In order for science to fulfill its potential in the arena of salmon recovery planning, several shortcomings of the science and its application to decision-making must be rectified. The definition of conservation units using genetic and phylogenetic inference needs to be sharpened. Ecological analyses must get beyond casting blame for past declines in salmon numbers and examine mixed strategies of management that consider interactions between hatcheries, harvest, hydropower, and habitat factors as well as background natural stresses and invasive species. Glib acceptance of expert opinion and extrapolated or inferred data should be tempered. To deal with uncertainty, recovery teams should engage in scenario analyses in which a wide variety of assumptions are played out. Finally, there is a pressing need for analyses aimed at determining what circumstances and communication strategies give science an effective voice in decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150504

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruckelshaus, M. H., Levin, P., Johnson, J. B., & Kareiva, P. M.
Affiliations
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
2002-11
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
665-706
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141174071
Cited by
254
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
Pacific salmon, science-policy interface, conservation units, hatchery management, harvest management, hydropower impacts, habitat degradation, invasive species, decision making under uncertainty, scenario analysis, expert opinion, science communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review