The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of Polyandry: Sperm Competition, Sperm Selection, and Offspring Viability
Abstract
▪ Abstract In contrast to Bateman's principle, there is now increasing evidence that female fitness can depend on the number of mates obtained. A number of genetic benefits have been proposed for the evolution of polyandry. A meta-analysis of available data suggests that polyandry, rather than multiple mating, can have a weak but significant general effect on embryo viability, as indicated by egg hatching success. Although this effect is generally regarded as evidence in favor of the genetic incompatibility hypothesis, appropriate data that test for intrinsic sire effects on embryo viability are generally unavailable. Moreover, maternal effects that could generate the result have not been adequately controlled, and there is little unequivocal evidence to suggest that fertilization is biased toward sperm bearing genotypes that would enhance offspring viability. Greater effort is required in these areas to elucidate the mechanisms underlying observed fitness effects of polyandry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Cited by
Sexual selection and mate choice
Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015 · Cited by 1,258
Self-citationMate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory
Kempenaers, B. (2007) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(07)37005-8 · Cited by 322
Last male sperm precedence is modulated by female remating rate in Drosophila melanogaster
Laturney, M., van Eijk, R., & Billeter, J.-C. (2018) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1002/evl3.50 · Cited by 53
Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice
Lenschow, C., Mendes, A. R. P., & Lima, S. Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2022.943888 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Simmons, L. W.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-146
- ISSN
- 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2069
- OpenAlex
- W2134935243
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Polyandry: Sperm Competition, Sperm Selection, and Offspring Viability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.112501
- The paper
- Simmons, L. W. (2005). The Evolution of Polyandry: Sperm Competition, Sperm Selection, and Offspring Viability. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.112501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.