The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pollen Limitation of Plant Reproduction: Pattern and Process
Abstract
▪ Abstract Quantifying the extent to which seed production is limited by the availability of pollen has been an area of intensive empirical study over the past few decades. Whereas theory predicts that pollen augmentation should not increase seed production, numerous empirical studies report significant and strong pollen limitation. Here, we use a variety of approaches to examine the correlates of pollen limitation in an effort to understand its occurrence and importance in plant evolutionary ecology. In particular, we examine the role of recent ecological perturbations in influencing pollen limitation and discuss the relation between pollen limitation and plant traits. We find that the magnitude of pollen limitation observed in natural populations depends on both historical constraints and contemporary ecological factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 1×
“…variable, we calculated effect size from pollen supplementation experiments as the log response ratio (ln R), ln R = ln (X̄ E/X̄C ), where X̄ is the mean of the response variable, and E and C denote the experimental (supplemented) and control treatments (Gurevitch et al. 2001, Hedges et al. 1999).”
MethodRecent Developments in the Analysis of Comparative Data
Pagel, M. D., & Harvey, P. H. (1988) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/416027 · Cited by 442
Cited by
Garibaldi, L. A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kremen, C., Morales, J. M., Bommarco, R., Cunningham, S. A., Carvalheiro, L. G., Chacoff, N. P., Dudenhöffer, J. H., Greenleaf, S. S., et al. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x · Cited by 962
EXPANDING THE LIMITS OF THE POLLEN-LIMITATION CONCEPT: EFFECTS OF POLLEN QUANTITY AND QUALITY
Aizen, M. A., & Harder, L. D. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/06-1017 · Cited by 521
Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes
ÖCKINGER, E., & SMITH, H. G. (2007) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x · Cited by 518
Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators
Reilly, J. R., Artz, D. R., Biddinger, D., Bobiwash, K., Boyle, N. K., Brittain, C., Brokaw, J., Campbell, J. W., Daniels, J., Elle, E., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.0922 · Cited by 361
Knauer, A. C., & Schiestl, F. P. (2017) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-016-9878-8 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Knight, T. M., Steets, J. A., Vamosi, J. C., Mazer, S. J., Burd, M., Campbell, D. R., Dudash, M. R., Johnston, M. O., Mitchell, R. J., & Ashman, T.-L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 467-497
- ISSN
- 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2069
- OpenAlex
- W2109428038
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollen Limitation of Plant Reproduction: Pattern and Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.115320
- The paper
- Knight, T. M., Steets, J. A., Vamosi, J. C., Mazer, S. J., Burd, M., Campbell, D. R., Dudash, M. R., Johnston, M. O., Mitchell, R. J., & Ashman, T.-L. (2005). Pollen Limitation of Plant Reproduction: Pattern and Process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.115320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
