The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Insect Antennae
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For very sharp in-place turns ( > 50 ° ), the fly steps its inner legs backward.”
From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“For sharper turns (20 ° - 50 ° ) the fly additionally decreases the stroke amplitude of its inner legs.”
From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“Walking flies use different strategies to turn depending on the sharpness of the turn 55 .”
From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
In the citing paper
“For smoother turns (i.e., rotations < 20 ° ) the fly mostly increases the stroke amplitude of its outer legs.”
From NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hansson, B. S., & Stensmyr, M. C. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.003 · Cited by 810
INFLUENCE OF THE LARVAL HOST PLANT ON REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES OF CERAMBYCID BEETLES
Hanks, L. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.483 · Cited by 480
Sensory Systems and Flight Stability: What do Insects Measure and Why?
Taylor, G. K., & Krapp, H. G. (2007) · Advances in insect physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(07)34005-8 · Cited by 318
Matsumoto, S. G., & Hildebrand, J. G. (1981) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1981.0066 · Cited by 316
Antennal Mechanosensors Mediate Flight Control in Moths
Sane, S. P., Dieudonné, A., Willis, M. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133598 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneider, D.
- Corresponding author
- Schneider, Dietrich
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1964-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-122
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W4254062003
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Entomology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Keywords
- insect antennae, antennal morphology, sensory organs, olfaction, chemoreception, insect sensory systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
