The DOI matches its Crossref record.
M ODELS OF D IVISION OF L ABOR IN S OCIAL I NSECTS
Abstract
▪ Abstract Division of labor is one of the most basic and widely studied aspects of colony behavior in social insects. Studies of division of labor are concerned with the integration of individual worker behavior into colony level task organization and with the question of how regulation of division of labor may contribute to colony efficiency. Here we describe and critique the current models concerned with the proximate causes of division of labor in social insects. The models have identified various proximate mechanisms to explain division of labor, based on both internal and external factors. On the basis of these factors, we suggest a classification of the models. We first describe the different types of models and then review the empirical evidence supporting them. The models to date may be considered preliminary and exploratory; they have advanced our understanding by suggesting possible mechanisms for division of labor and by revealing how individual and colony-level behavior may be related. They suggest specific hypotheses that can be tested by experiment and so may lead to the development of more powerful and integrative explanatory models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Consensus decision making in animals
Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008 · Cited by 872
Evolution of Self-Organized Task Specialization in Robot Swarms
Ferrante, E., Turgut, A. E., Duéñez-Guzmán, E., Dorigo, M., & Wenseleers, T. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004273 · Cited by 123
Mean-field models in swarm robotics: a survey
Elamvazhuthi, K., & Berman, S. (2019) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3190/ab49a4 · Cited by 110
Polarized information ecosystems can reorganize social networks via information cascades
Tokita, C. K., Guess, A. M., & Tarnita, C. E. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2102147118 · Cited by 92
Agassounon, W., Martinoli, A., & Easton, K. (2004) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/b:auro.0000033971.75494.c8 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Beshers, S. N., & Fewell, J. H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 413-440
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2172062401
- Cited by
- 869
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: M ODELS OF D IVISION OF L ABOR IN S OCIAL I NSECTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.413
- The paper
- Beshers, S. N., & Fewell, J. H. (2001). M ODELS OF D IVISION OF L ABOR IN S OCIAL I NSECTS. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.