CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 652Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyEntomological Studies and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 230 of the 232 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sequestration of Defensive Substances from Plants by Lepidoptera

Nishida, Ritsuo·2002·Annual Review of Entomology
DOI 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145121
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A number of aposematic butterfly and diurnal moth species sequester unpalatable or toxic substances from their host plants rather than manufacturing their own defensive substances. Despite a great diversity in their life histories, there are some general features in the selective utilization of plant secondary metabolites to achieve effective protection from predators. This review illustrates the biochemical, physiological, and ecological characteristics of phytochemical-based defense systems that can shed light on the evolution of the widely developed sequestering lifestyles among the Lepidoptera.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145121

Cites

230 of 230 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Ackery PR, 1993, Nat. Hist. Mus. LA Cty. Sci. Ser., 38, 79
  2. Anonymous. 1994. Wednesday, 1 st June. Exhibit. In Antenna , pp. 207
  3. Aplin RT, 1975, J. Entomol., 30, 73
  4. Bate-Smith EC. 1972. Attractant and repellents in higher animals. In Phytochemical Ecology , ed. JB Harborne, pp. 45–56. London: Academic
  5. Bowers MD. 1988. Plant allelochemistry and mimicry. In Novel Aspects of Insect-Plant Interactions , ed. P Barbosa, DK Letourneau, pp. 273–311. New York: Wiley
  6. Bowers MD. 1990. Recycling plant natural products for insect defense. In Insect Defenses , ed. DL Evans, JO Schmidt, pp. 353–86. Albany, NY: SUNY Press
  7. Bowers MD. 1992. The evolution of unpalatability and the cost of chemical defense in insects. In Chemical Ecology of Insects: An Evolutionary Approach , ed. B Roitberg, MB Isman, pp. 216–44. New York: Chapman & Hall
  8. Bowers MD. 1993. Aposematic caterpillars: life-styles of the warningly colored and unpalatable. In Caterpillars , ed. NE Stamp, TM Casey, pp. 331–71. New York: Chapman & Hall
  9. Brower LP. 1984. Chemical defence in butterflies. In The Biology of Butterflies , ed. RI Vane-Wright, PR Ackery, pp. 109–34. London: Academic
  10. Brown KS, 1988, Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 113, 83
  11. Ford EB, 1941, Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. London Ser. A, 16, 65
  12. Franzl S, 1984, Entomol. Abh., 48, 1
  13. Frazer JFD, 1960, Int. Congr. Entomol., 3, 249
  14. Fung SY, 1988, J. Chem. Ecol., 14, 1099
  15. Futuyma DJ. 1983. Evolutionary interactions among herbivorous insects and plants. In Coevolution , ed. DJ Futuyma, M Slatkin, pp. 207–31. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
  16. Ghosal S, 1991, Indian J. Chem., 30, 260
  17. Harborne JB. 1991. The chemical basis of plant defense. In Plant Defenses Against Mammalian Herbivory , ed. RT Palo, CT Robbins, pp. 45–59. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
  18. Malcolm SB, 1993, Nat. Hist. Mus. LA Cty. Sci. Ser., 38, 253
  19. Nelson CJ, 1993, Nat. Hist. Mus. LA Cty. Sci. Ser., 38, 83
  20. 10.1271/bbb1961.54.2347 · DOI
  21. 10.1271/bbb1961.55.1787 · DOI
  22. Nishida R, 1990, Chem. Express, 5, 497
  23. Nishio S. 1980. The fates and adaptive significance of cardenolides sequestered by larvae of Danaus plexippus ( L .) and Cycnia inopinatus ( Hy. Edwards ). PhD thesis. Univ. Georgia. 119 pp.
  24. Ritland DB, 1991, Science, 350, 497
  25. Roeske CN, 1975, Recent Adv. Phytochem., 10, 93
  26. Rothschild M, 1967, Nat. Hist. NY, 76, 44
  27. Rothschild M, 1972, Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. London, 6, 59
  28. Rothschild M, 1979, Symb. Bot. Upsal., 22, 82
  29. Rothschild M. 1985. British aposematic Lepidoptera. In The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland , ed. J Heath, AM Emmet, pp. 9–62. Essex, England: Harley Books
  30. Rothschild M, 1973, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B, 183, 227
  31. Thompson JN. 1999. What we know and do not know about coevolution: insect herbivores and plants as a test case. In Herbivores: Between Plants and Predators , ed. H Olff, VK Brown, RH Drent, pp. 7–30. Oxford: Blackwell Sci.
  32. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01663.x · DOI
  33. Turner JRG. 1982. Darwin's coffin and Doctor Pangloss—Do adaptationist models explain mimicry? In Evolutionary Ecology , ed. B Shorrocks, pp. 313–61. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications
  34. Urzúa A, 1985, Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 13, 169
  35. Verschaffelt E, 1911, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amsterdam, 13, 536
  36. Wink M, 1993, Alkaloids, 43, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 652

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nishida, R.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nishida, Ritsuo
ORCID
Nishida, Ritsuo
Venue
Annual Review of Entomology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2002-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
57-92
ISSN
  • 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4487
DOI
10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145121
OpenAlex
W2155710214
Cited by
652
References
232
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 35
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Entomological Studies and Ecology
Keywords
sequestration, aposematism, Lepidoptera, butterfly larvae, moth larvae, plant secondary metabolites, chemical defense, predator avoidance, host plant selection
MeSH terms
Animals, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Lepidoptera, Plants, Predatory Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review