The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
C ONTACT C HEMORECEPTION IN F EEDING BY P HYTOPHAGOUS I NSECTS
Abstract
▪ Abstract Gustatory receptors associated with feeding in phytophagous insects are broadly categorized as phagostimulatory or deterrent. No phytophagous insect is known that tastes all its essential nutrients, and the ability to discriminate between nutrients is limited. The insects acquire a nutritional balance largely “adventitiously” because leaves have an appropriate chemical composition. Sugars are the most important phagostimulants. Plant secondary compounds are most often deterrent but stimulate phagostimulatory cells if they serve as host-indicating sign stimuli, or if they are sequestered for defense or used as pheromone precursors. The stimulating effects of chemicals are greatly affected by other chemicals in mixtures like those to which the sensilla are normally exposed. Host plant selection depends on the balance of phagostimulatory and deterrent inputs with, in some oligophagous and monophagous species, a dominating role of a host-related chemical. Evolution of phytophagy has probably involved a change in emphasis in the gustatory system, not fundamentally new developments. The precise role of the gustatory systems remains unclear. In grasshoppers, it probably governs food selection and the amounts eaten, but in caterpillars there is some evidence that central feedbacks are also involved in regulating the amount eaten.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SOME PROPERTIES OF GUSTATION IN THE LARVA OF PIERIS BRASSICAE
WEI‐CHUN, M. (1969) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1969.tb02555.x · Cited by 59
Cited by
Matsuo, T., Sugaya, S., Yasukawa, J., Aigaki, T., & Fuyama, Y. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050118 · Cited by 398
Dual Mechanism for Bitter Avoidance in Drosophila
French, A. S., Sellier, M.-J., Ali Agha, M., Guigue, A., Chabaud, M.-A., Reeb, P. D., Mitra, A., Grau, Y., Soustelle, L., & Marion-Poll, F. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1312-14.2015 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, R. F.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 455-484
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2116831082
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: C ONTACT C HEMORECEPTION IN F EEDING BY P HYTOPHAGOUS I NSECTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112629
- The paper
- Chapman, R. F. (2003). C ONTACT C HEMORECEPTION IN F EEDING BY P HYTOPHAGOUS I NSECTS. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.48.091801.112629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.