The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INVASION BIOLOGY OF THRIPS
Abstract
▪ Abstract Thrips are among the stealthiest of insect invaders due to their small size and cryptic habits. Many invasive thrips are notorious for causing extensive crop damage, vectoring viral diseases, and permanently destabilizing IPM systems owing to irruptive outbreaks that require remediation with insecticides, leading to the development of insecticide resistance. Several challenges surface when attempting to manage incursive thrips species. Foremost among these is early recognition, followed by rapid and accurate identification of emergent pest species, elucidation of the region of origin, development of a management program, and the closing of conduits for global movement of thrips. In this review, we examine factors facilitating invasion by thrips, damage caused by these insects, pre- and post-invasion management tactics, and challenges looming on the horizon posed by invasive Thysanoptera, which continually challenge the development of sustainable management practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Mark Lonsdale, W., Evans, H., Clout, M., & Bazzaz, F. A. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:bicegc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,156
Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis
Keane, R. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02499-0 · Cited by 3,662
Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders
Kolar, C. S., & Lodge, D. M. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02101-2 · Cited by 2,825
The distribution and abundance of animals
Andrewartha, H. G., & Birch, L. C. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,774
Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions
Shea, K. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02495-3 · Cited by 2,271
The Distribution and Abundance of Animals
Cook, W. C. (1956) · Annals of the Entomological Society of America · doi:10.1093/aesa/49.2.190 · Cited by 1,821
Introduced species and their missing parasites
Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P., McKenzie, V. J., & Kuris, A. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01346 · Cited by 1,491
PLANT TRANSFORMATION: Problems and Strategies for Practical Application
Birch, R. G. (1997) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.297 · Cited by 621
Predicting Biological Invasions
Heger, T., & Trepl, L. (2003) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/b:binv.0000005568.44154.12 · Cited by 262
Microbial hazards in plant tissue and cell cultures
Leifert, C., & Cassells, A. C. (2001) · In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant · doi:10.1007/s11627-001-0025-y · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Morse, J. G., & Hoddle, M. S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-89
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2148120521
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INVASION BIOLOGY OF THRIPS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151044
- The paper
- Morse, J. G., & Hoddle, M. S. (2006). INVASION BIOLOGY OF THRIPS. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
