The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Decline and Conservation of Bumble Bees
Open accessAbstract
Declines in bumble bee species in the past 60 years are well documented in Europe, where they are driven primarily by habitat loss and declines in floral abundance and diversity resulting from agricultural intensification. Impacts of habitat degradation and fragmentation are likely to be compounded by the social nature of bumble bees and their largely monogamous breeding system, which renders their effective population size low. Hence, populations are susceptible to stochastic extinction events and inbreeding. In North America, catastrophic declines of some bumble bee species since the 1990s are probably attributable to the accidental introduction of a nonnative parasite from Europe, a result of global trade in domesticated bumble bee colonies used for pollination of greenhouse crops. Given the importance of bumble bees as pollinators of crops and wildflowers, steps must be taken to prevent further declines. Suggested measures include tight regulation of commercial bumble bee use and targeted use of environmentally comparable schemes to enhance floristic diversity in agricultural landscapes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Current data suggest an overall pattern of decline in insect diversity and abundance.”
From More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Data for other well-studied taxa such as bees [8–14] and moths [15–18] suggest the same trend.”
From More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Our results demonstrate that recently reported declines in several taxa such as butterflies [7, 25–27, 58], wild bees [8–14] and moths [15–18], are in parallel with a severe loss of total aerial insect biomass, suggesting that it is not only the vulnerable species, but the flying insect community as a whole, that has been decimated over the last few decades.”
From More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Introduction to conservation genetics
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., & Briscoe, D. A. (2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1529 · Cited by 3,506
QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES
Wilcove, D., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313420 · Cited by 3,357
Introduction to Conservation Genetics
Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D., Briscoe, D. A., & McInnes, K. H. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808999 · Cited by 3,139
Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters
Waser, N. M., Chıttka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M., & Ollerton, J. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265575 · Cited by 1,941
Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification
Kremen, C., Williams, N. M., & Thorp, R. W. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.262413599 · Cited by 1,928
How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
Kleijn, D., & Sutherland, W. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x · Cited by 1,505
Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions
Memmott, J., Waser, N. M., & Price, M. V. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2909 · Cited by 1,282
Delaplane, K. S., & Mayer, D. F. (2000) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851994482.0000 · Cited by 837
Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale
Westphal, C., Steffan-Dewenter, I. D., & Tscharntke, T. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00523.x · Cited by 764
Effects of Introduced Bees on Native Ecosystems
Goulson, D. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132355 · Cited by 746
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Alford DV, 1980, Atlas of the Bumblebees of the British Isles
- Bourke AFG, 2002, Genetics of the scarce bumble bee, Bombus distinguendus, and nonlethal sampling of DNA from bumble bees
- Franklin MT, 2004, Ecotoxicology, 97, 369
- Goulson D, 2003, Int. J. Food Agric. Environ., 1, 142
- Matsumara C, 2004, Jpn. J. Conserv. Ecol., 9, 93
- Osborne JL, 1994, Asp. Appl. Biol., 40, 207
- Pirounakis K, 1998, Eur. J. Entomol., 95, 27
- Rasmont P, 1988, Ann. Soc. R. Zool. Belg., 118, 141
- Thorp RW, 2005, Red List of Pollinator Insects of North America
- Thorp RW, 2005, Red List of Pollinator Insects of North America
- 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884070 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers
Goulson, D., Nicholls, E., Botías, C., & Rotheray, E. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1255957 · Cited by 4,074
“Herbicides are highly effective at minimizing weed problems in most cropping systems, enabling farmers to grow near-pure monocultures, but their use inevitably reduces the availability of flowers for pollinators and can contribute substantially to rendering farmland an inhospitable environment for bees (11, 58, 59).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMore than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas
Hallmann, C. A., Sorg, M., Jongejans, E., Siepel, H., Hofland, N., Schwan, H., Stenmans, W., Müller, A., Sumser, H., Hörren, T., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 · Cited by 3,499
Self-citationREVIEW: An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides
Goulson, D. (2013) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12111 · Cited by 1,970
Self-citationPatterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees
Cameron, S. A., Lozier, J. D., Strange, J. P., Koch, J. B. U., Cordes, N., Solter, L. F., & Griswold, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014743108 · Cited by 1,622
“Population genetic factors could also play a role in Bombus population decline (8).”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Goulson, D., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- ORCID
- Goulson, D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-208
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2100945295
- Cited by
- 1,183
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Annual Review of Entomology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Pesticide Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Keywords
- bumblebees, population decline (ecology), habitat loss, agricultural intensification, floral diversity, habitat fragmentation, inbreeding, stochastic extinction, pollination, conservation, pollinator decline, North America, Europe
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Animals, Bees, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environment, Pesticides, Population Dynamics, Flowers, Biodiversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
