The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis
Abstract
Environmental cost-benefit analysis, or CBA, refers to the economic appraisal of policies and projects that have the deliberate aim of improving the provision of environmental services or actions that might affect (sometimes adversely) the environment as an indirect consequence. Vital advances have arisen in response to the challenges that environmental problems and environmental policy pose for CBA. In this article, we review a number of these developments. Perhaps most notably this includes continuing progress in techniques to value environmental changes. Growing experience of these methods has resulted in, on the one hand, ever greater sophistication in application and, on the other hand, scrutiny regarding their validity and reliability. Distributional concerns have led to a renewal of interest in how appraisals might throw light on questions about equity as well as efficiency, and there have been substantial new insights for discounting costs and benefits in the far-off future. Uncertainty about what is lost when environmental assets are degraded or depleted has resulted in a number of distinct proposals although precaution is the watchword in each. Just as importantly, there is a need to understand when CBA is used in practice and why environmental decisions are often made in a manner apparently inconsistent with cost-benefit thinking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Dixit, R. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994) · doi:10.1515/9781400830176 · Cited by 9,029
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
Lancaster, K. J. (1966) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259131 · Cited by 8,471
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1955) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295722 · Cited by 2,834 · cited 1×
“Time-varying discount rates also have their own problems, and chief among these is time inconsistency where plans that are made at one point in time are contradicted or reversed by later behavior [Strotz (127)].”
BackgroundApplied Choice Analysis: A Primer
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610356 · Cited by 1,823
A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change
Weitzman, M. L. (2007) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.45.3.703 · Cited by 1,024
List, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1498 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Optimising value from the soft re-use of brownfield sites
Bardos, R. P., Jones, S., Stephenson, I., Menger, P., Beumer, V., Neonato, F., Maring, L., Ferber, U., Track, T., & Wendler, K. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.002 · Cited by 84
Sabbaghi, M., & Behdad, S. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.015 · Cited by 75
Shahidul, M. I., Malcolm, M. L., Hashmi, M. S. J., & Alhaji, M. H. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.11275-5 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Environment and Resources
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-11-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 317-344
- ISSN
- 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2050
- OpenAlex
- W2138181124
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.112927
- The paper
- Atkinson, G., & Mourato, S. (2008). Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.112927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.