Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 790

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modes of Animal Speciation

Bush, Guy L.·1975·Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Abstract

The study of speciation is an ad hoc science. No one has yet observed the develop­ ment from beginning to end of a new plant or animal species in nature. The fossil record, so useful in painting a broad picture of long-term evolutionary trends, lacks the temporal and biological sensitivity to dissect the multitude of processes involved in speciation. Population genetics, the extreme opposite of paleontology in its ability to measure and model gene frequency changes and stability, has also failed to provide much insight into the genetics of speciation (110). At the molecular level, proteins used in the current flush of allozyme studies (110, 158, 174) have almost no direct bearing on speciation. Estimates of genetic differen­ tiation based on allozyme data alone (i.e. 147, 189), therefore, provide only crude indexes of genetic divergence between species and so-called semispecies, most of which could easily be regarded as species (178). Moreover, animals used in these studies have often long since passed through the critical point of no return, at which hybridization will no longer result in fusion of two races (24, 29, 110). They tell us little about how many or what kind of genes are directly implicated in speciation itself. Thus we are still forced to reconstruct events surrounding specia­ tion from observations on extant species, a task that has fallen almost exclusively to the naturalist (see 44, 69, 72, 124 for historical aspects). Speciation is ultimately an adaptive process that involves establishment of intrin­ sic barriers to gene flow between closely related populations by development of reproductive isolating mechanisms. A study of speciation is, to a considerable extent, a study of the genetics and evolution of reproductive isolating mechanisms. Most evolutionists therefore generally accept as a working definition the biological species concept: species represent groups of interbreeding natural populations repro­ ductively isolated from other such groups (125). Although it has its weak points (44), alternatives (e.g. 65, 164) impose more problems than they solve. Selection for reproductive isolation between closely related populations is funda­ mentally different from the process involved in local adaptation (28, 109, 181). The latter entails only minor genetic adjustments, whereas speciation frequently involves a reorganization of some crucial component in the genetic system that results in a

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.002011

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 790

Metadata

Authors
Bush, G. L.
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
Published
1975-11
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
339-364
ISSN
0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047727977
Cited by
790
References
0
FWCI
27.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modes of Animal Speciation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.002011
The paper
Bush, G. L. (1975). Modes of Animal Speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.002011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.