The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How to be a Fig
Abstract
The 900-odd species of Ficus (20, 21) constitute the most distinctive of the widespread genera of tropical plants. Figs have (a) a complex obligatory mutualism with their pollinating agaonid fig wasps, yet are found in almost all tropical habitat types and geographic locations [this sets them apart from ant-acacias (63-65), euglossine-orchids (24,26), moth-yuccas (45, 88, 89,), ant-epiphytes (66, 98) and ant-fungi (109)]; (b) fruits eaten by a large variety of vertebrates, most of which appear to be fig seed dispersers rather than seed predators; (c) minute seeds despite the adults’ long-lived woody life form; (d) exceptionally numerous congeners in almost any mainland tropical forest habitat; (e) every woody life-form (deciduous, evergreen; tree, strangler, epiphyte, vine, scandent shrub, bush); (f) intra-population inter-tree asynchronous flowering and fruiting in many habitats, yet strong intra-tree synchronous flowering and fruiting; (g) heavy outcrossed pollination even when the density of flowering conspecifics is extremely low; (h) no inter-specific competition for pollinators within a habitat irrespective of the number of Ficus species present and the timing of sexual reproduction; (i) heavy visitation of fruiting crowns by seed dispersers even when the density of conspecifics is extremely low; and (j) over 50% predispersal seed predation of all seed crops. There is a voluminous literature on the taxonomy and biology of fig flowers, fig fruits, and fig wasps (see reviews in 1, 9, 16, 20-22, 34-36, 41, 47, 52, 86, 90-96, 101, 112, 113), but each author focused on particular aspects of the system. Here I stress interactions among many parts of the system. Wiebes’ chapter in this volume is the most recent review of the details of the interaction of fig wasps with figs. However, a very brief overview of fig biology is useful here. First, ignore the atypical commercial fig, Ficus carica, since it occupies extra-tropical to sub-tropical habitats, has decidu-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Neotropical Anachronisms: The Fruits the Gomphotheres Ate
Janzen, D. H., & Martin, P. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.215.4528.19 · Cited by 913
Self-citationWeiblen, G. D. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145213 · Cited by 444
Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths
Pellmyr, O., & Huth, C. J. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372257a0 · Cited by 408
Determinants of Plant-Animal Coevolution: The Case of Mutualistic Dispersal of Seeds by Vertebrates
Herrera, C. M. (1985) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544054 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Janzen, D. H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1979-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-51
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2173765376
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to be a Fig. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.000305
- The paper
- Janzen, D. H. (1979). How to be a Fig. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.000305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.