The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of Monogamy: Hypotheses and Evidence
Abstract
Recent theoretical insights are helping to clarify how animal mating sys tems evolve. An integrated theory is beginning to emerge from the realiza tion that males and females have overlapping but nonidentical reproductive interests and that the type of mating system shown by a species results from interactions between the individual interests of each sex. The optimal mat ing system for promoting individual reproductive interests often differs for each sex, and when it does, the interests of one sex constrain the reproduc tive options open to the other. Thus, mating system theory revolves around two major issues: the factors determining which sex predominates in shap ing each mating system, and the factors determining which mating system is optimal for members of the controlling sex. The greatest progress has been made in explaining how polygynous mat ing systems evolved, particularly among territorial vertebrates, and more recent work is clarifying the specific environmental conditions involved (4, 46, 145, 146, 161, 227, 244, 246, 247). Promiscuous and polyandrous mating systems are less well understood, but several promising avenues toward a general theory have begun to develop (7 1, 9 1 , 126, 240, 245, 246). In contrast, theoretical work on the evolution of monogamy lags far behind, despite an enormous literature on monogamous animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
On the Evolution of Mating Systems in Birds and Mammals
Orians, G. H. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282628 · Cited by 1,511
Cited by
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence
BONDURIANSKY, R. (2001) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793101005693 · Cited by 1,018
The evolution of social monogamy in mammals
Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238677 · Cited by 678
THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF COLONIALITY IN BIRDS
Wittenberger, J. F., & Hunt, G. L. (1985) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249408-6.50010-8 · Cited by 499
Self-citationThe evolution of the social brain: anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates
Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0693 · Cited by 344
McCracken, G. F., & Wilkinson, G. S. (2000) · Reproductive Biology of Bats · doi:10.1016/b978-012195670-7/50009-6 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Wittenberger, J. F., & Tilson, R. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1980-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-232
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127584704
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Monogamy: Hypotheses and Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001213
- The paper
- Wittenberger, J. F., & Tilson, R. L. (1980). The Evolution of Monogamy: Hypotheses and Evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.