The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Population Viability Analysis
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) are numerical tools that combine observations of species occurrence or abundance with environmental estimates. They are used to gain ecological and evolutionary insights and to predict distributions across landscapes, ...Read More
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Model selection in ecology and evolution
Johnson, J. B., & Omland, K. S. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013 · Cited by 3,838
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS
Royle, J. A., & Nichols, J. D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:eafrpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,364
Marcot, B. G., Holthausen, R. S., Raphael, M. G., Rowland, M. M., & Wisdom, M. J. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00452-2 · Cited by 417
Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers
Hedrick, P. W., & Fredrickson, R. (2010) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-009-9999-5 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyce, M. S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 481-497
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3142112479
- Cited by
- 1,242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population Viability Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002405
- The paper
- Boyce, M. S. (1992). Population Viability Analysis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.002405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
