The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Phenology of Tropical Forests: Adaptive Significance and Consequences for Primary Consumers
Abstract
Most tropical woody plants produce new leaves and flowers in bursts rather than continuously, and most tropical forest communities display seasonal variation in the presence of new leaves, flowers, and fruits. This patterning suggests that phenological changes represent adaptations to either biotic or abiotic factors. Biotic factors may select for either a staggering or a clustering of the phenological activity of individual plant species. We review the evidence for several hypotheses. The idea that plant species can reduce predation by synchronizing their phenological activity has the best support. However, because biotic factors are often arbitrary with respect to the timing of these peaks, it is essential also to consider abiotic influences. A review of published studies demonstrates a major role for climate. Peaks in irradiance are accompanied by peaks in flushing and flowering except where water stress makes this impossible. Thus, in seasonally dry forests, many plants concentrate leafing and flowering around the start of the rainy season; they also tend to fruit at the same time, probably to minimize seedling mortality during the subsequent dry season. Phenological variation at the level of the forest community affects primary consumers who respond by dietary switching, seasonal breeding, changes in range use, or migration. During periods of scarcity, certain plant products, keystone resources, act as mainstays of the primary consumer community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Garden Game: Shifting Cultivation, Indigenous Hunting and Wildlife Ecology in Western Panama
Smith, D. A. (2005) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-005-5157-y · Cited by 110
Foraging Cognition in Nonhuman Primates
Zuberbühler, K., & Janmaat, K. (2010) · Primate Neuroethology · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195326598.003.0004 · Cited by 61
Viganò, C., Mainardi, A., Alonso‐Alonso, P., Gottstein, M., Romero, V., Samaniego, R., Uchuari, J. P., & Heer, K. (2026) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.73918
Metadata
- Authors
- van Schaik, C. P., Terborgh, J. W., & Wright, S. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 353-377
- ISSN
- 0066-4162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2177098778
- Cited by
- 1,292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Phenology of Tropical Forests: Adaptive Significance and Consequences for Primary Consumers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002033
- The paper
- van Schaik, C. P., Terborgh, J. W., & Wright, S. J. (1993). The Phenology of Tropical Forests: Adaptive Significance and Consequences for Primary Consumers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.