The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BLOOD FLOW IN ARTERIES
Abstract
▪ Abstract Blood flow in arteries is dominated by unsteady flow phenomena. The cardiovascular system is an internal flow loop with multiple branches in which a complex liquid circulates. A nondimensional frequency parameter, the Womersley number, governs the relationship between the unsteady and viscous forces. Normal arterial flow is laminar with secondary flows generated at curves and branches. The arteries are living organs that can adapt to and change with the varying hemodynamic conditions. In certain circumstances, unusual hemodynamic conditions create an abnormal biological response. Velocity profile skewing can create pockets in which the direction of the wall shear stress oscillates. Atherosclerotic disease tends to be localized in these sites and results in a narrowing of the artery lumen—a stenosis. The stenosis can cause turbulence and reduce flow by means of viscous head losses and flow choking. Very high shear stresses near the throat of the stenosis can activate platelets and thereby induce thrombosis, which can totally block blood flow to the heart or brain. Detection and quantification of stenosis serve as the basis for surgical intervention. In the future, the study of arterial blood flow will lead to the prediction of individual hemodynamic flows in any patient, the development of diagnostic tools to quantify disease, and the design of devices that mimic or alter blood flow. This field is rich with challenging problems in fluid mechanics involving three-dimensional, pulsatile flows at the edge of turbulence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Cited by
Chatzizisis, Y. S., Coskun, A. U., Jonas, M., Edelman, E. R., Feldman, C. L., & Stone, P. H. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.059 · Cited by 1,483
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY: Mapping Biobehavioral Contributions to Health and Illness
Baum, A., & Posluszny, D. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.137 · Cited by 413
Barabino, G. A., Platt, M. O., & Kaul, D. K. (2010) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105339 · Cited by 311
Microfluidic techniques for development of 3D vascularized tissue
Hasan, A., Paul, A., Vrana, N. E., Zhao, X., Memic, A., Hwang, Y.-S., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.091 · Cited by 282
Benchmarking in vitro tissue-engineered blood–brain barrier models
DeStefano, J. G., Jamieson, J. J., Linville, R. M., & Searson, P. C. (2018) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-018-0117-2 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Ku, D. N.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 399-434
- ISSN
- 0066-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4479
- OpenAlex
- W2134688511
- Cited by
- 1,477
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BLOOD FLOW IN ARTERIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.399
- The paper
- Ku, D. N. (1997). BLOOD FLOW IN ARTERIES. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.