The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENTS IN HUMANS
Abstract
▪ Abstract Cytogenetic imbalance in the newborn is a frequent cause of mental retardation and birth defects. Although aneuploidy accounts for the majority of imbalance, structural aberrations contribute to a significant fraction of recognized chromosomal anomalies. This review describes the major classes of constitutional, structural cytogenetic abnormalities and recent studies that explore the molecular mechanisms that bring about their de novo occurrence. Genomic features flanking the sites of recombination may result in susceptibility to chromosomal rearrangement. One such substrate for recombination is low-copy region-specific repeats. The identification of genome architectural features conferring susceptibility to rearrangements has been accomplished using methods that enable investigation of regions of the genome that are too small to be visualized by traditional cytogenetics and too large to be resolved by conventional gel electrophoresis. These investigations resulted in the identification of previously unrecognized structural cytogenetic anomalies, which are associated with genetic syndromes and allowed for the molecular basis of some chromosomal rearrangements to be delineated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants: I. Incidence of chromosome abnormalities
Hamerton, J. L., Canning, N., Ray, M., & Smith, S. (1975) · Clinical Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb01498.x · Cited by 565
Cited by
Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution
Zhang, F., Gu, W., Hurles, M. E., & Lupski, J. R. (2009) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164217 · Cited by 1,207
Self-citationPhenotypic impact of genomic structural variation: insights from and for human disease
Weischenfeldt, J., Symmons, O., Spitz, F., & Korbel, J. O. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3373 · Cited by 658
Kendall, K. M., Rees, E., Escott-Price, V., Einon, M., Thomas, R., Hewitt, J., O’Donovan, M. C., Owen, M. J., Walters, J. T. R., & Kirov, G. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.014 · Cited by 226
Clayton-Smith, J., Giblin, C., Smith, R. A., Dunn, C., & Willatt, L. (2010) · Clinical Dysmorphology · doi:10.1097/mcd.0b013e32833a1e3c · Cited by 64
DNA Replication Origin Plasticity and Perturbed Fork Progression in Human Inverted Repeats
Lebofsky, R., & Bensimon, A. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.25.15.6789-6797.2005 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaffer, L. G., & Lupski, J. R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 297-329
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2118555914
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MOLECULAR MECHANISMS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENTS IN HUMANS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.297
- The paper
- Shaffer, L. G., & Lupski, J. R. (2000). MOLECULAR MECHANISMS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENTS IN HUMANS. Annual Review of Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.