Genomic Insights into Marine Microalgae
Abstract
Marine eukaryotic photosynthesis is dominated by a diverse group of unicellular organisms collectively called microalgae. Microalgae include cells derived from a primary endosymbiotic event (similar to land plants) and cells derived from subsequent secondary and/or tertiary endosymbiotic events. These latter cells are chimeras of several genomes and dominate primary production in the marine environment. Two consequences of multiple endosymbiotic events include complex targeting mechanisms to allow nuclear-encoded proteins to be imported into the plastid and coordination of enzymes, potentially from disparate originator cells, to form complete metabolic pathways. In this review, we discuss the forces that shaped the genomes of marine microalgae and then discuss some of the metabolic consequences of such a complex evolutionary history. We focus our metabolic discussion on carbon, nitrogen, and iron. We then discuss biomineralization and new evidence for programmed cell death in microalgae. We conclude with a short summary on advances in genetic manipulation of microalgae and thoughts on the future directions of marine algal genomics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Algae efficiently use CO2 and are responsible for more than 40% of global carbon fixation, with the majority of this productivity coming from marine microalgae.
“Algae efficiently use CO2, and are responsible for more than 40% of the global carbon fixation, with the majority of this productivity coming from marine microalgae [14,15].”
From Biofuels from algae: Challenges and potential (2010) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 149 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- Parker, M. S., Mock, T., & Armbrust, E. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom;
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 619-645
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2144475932
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P50ES012762)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Keywords
- marine microalgae, endosymbiosis, chloroplast genome, nuclear-encoded plastid proteins, protein targeting, carbon metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, iron metabolism, biomineralization, programmed cell death, algal genomics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Carbon, Environment, Biological Evolution, Iron, Marine Biology, Models, Genetic, Nitrogen, Phytoplankton, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Symbiosis, Genome, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Eukaryota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review