The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection on Codon Bias
Abstract
In a wide variety of organisms, synonymous codons are used with different frequencies, a phenomenon known as codon bias. Population genetic studies have shown that synonymous sites are under weak selection and that codon bias is maintained by a balance between selection, mutation, and genetic drift. It appears that the major cause for selection on codon bias is that certain preferred codons are translated more accurately and/or efficiently. However, additional and sometimes maybe even contradictory selective forces appear to affect codon usage as well. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the ways in which natural selection participates in the creation and maintenance of codon bias. We also raise several open questions: (i) Is natural selection weak independently of the level of codon bias? It is possible that selection for preferred codons is weak only when codon bias approaches equilibrium and may be quite strong on genes with codon bias levels that are much lower and/or above equilibrium. (ii) What determines the identity of the major codons? (iii) How do shifts in codon bias occur? (iv) What is the exact nature of selection on codon bias? We discuss these questions in depth and offer some ideas on how they can be addressed using a combination of computational and experimental analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global analysis of protein expression in yeast
Ghaemmaghami, S., Huh, W.-K., Bower, K., Howson, R. W., Belle, A., Dephoure, N., O'Shea, E. K., & Weissman, J. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02046 · Cited by 3,750
Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X., & Marcotte, E. M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1270 · Cited by 1,139
Cited by
Gabriel, L., Brůna, T., Hoff, K. J., Ebel, M., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M., & Stanke, M. (2024) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.278090.123 · Cited by 676
Evidence That Mutation Is Universally Biased towards AT in Bacteria
Hershberg, R., & Petrov, D. A. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001115 · Cited by 490
Self-citationSynonymous Codons Direct Cotranslational Folding toward Different Protein Conformations
Buhr, F., Jha, S., Thommen, M., Mittelstaet, J., Kutz, F., Schwalbe, H., Rodnina, M. V., & Komar, A. A. (2016) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.008 · Cited by 395
Codon usage bias and the evolution of influenza A viruses. Codon Usage Biases of Influenza Virus
Wong, E. H., Smith, D. K., Rabadan, R., Peiris, M., & Poon, L. L. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-253 · Cited by 339
Balanced Codon Usage Optimizes Eukaryotic Translational Efficiency
Qian, W., Yang, J.-R., Pearson, N. M., Maclean, C., & Zhang, J. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002603 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Hershberg, R., & Petrov, D. A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-12-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 287-299
- ISSN
- 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2948
- OpenAlex
- W2148734328
- Cited by
- 1,061
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection on Codon Bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091442
- The paper
- Hershberg, R., & Petrov, D. A. (2008). Selection on Codon Bias. Annual Review of Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091442
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.