The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IgA Fc Receptors
Abstract
The IgA receptor family comprises a number of surface receptors including the polymeric Ig receptor involved in epithelial transport of IgA/IgM, the myeloid specific IgA Fc receptor (FcαRI or CD89), the Fcα/μR, and at least two alternative IgA receptors. These are the asialoglycoprotein receptor and the transferrin receptor, which have been implicated in IgA catabolism, and tissue IgA deposition. In this reviewwe focus on the biology of FcαRI (CD89). FcαRI is expressed on neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, and Kupffer cells. This receptor represents a heterogeneously glycosylated transmembrane protein that binds both IgA subclasses with low affinity. A single gene encoding FcαRI has been isolated, which is located within the leukocyte receptor cluster on chromosome 19. The FcαRI α chain lacks canonical signal transduction domains but can associate with the FcR γ-chain that bears an activation motif (ITAM) in the cytoplasmic domain, allowing activatory functions. FcαRI expressed alone mediates endocytosis and recyling of IgA. No FcαRI homologue has been defined in the mouse, and progress in defining the in vivo role of FcαRI has been made using human FcαRI transgenic (Tg) mice. FcαRI-Tg mice demonstrated FcαRI expression on Kupffer cells and so defined a key role for the receptor in mucosal defense. The receptor functions as a second line of antibacterial defense involving serum IgA rather than secretory IgA. Studies in FcαRI-Tg mice, furthermore, defined an essential role for soluble FcαRI in the development of IgA nephropathy by formation of circulating IgA-FcαRI complexes. Finally, recent work points out a role for human IgA in treatment of infectious and neoplastic diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LANG, M. L., CHEN, Y.-W., SHEN, L., GAO, H., LANG, G. A., WADE, T. K., & WADE, W. F. (2002) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20011696 · Cited by 60
Cited by
Of Mice and Not Men: Differences between Mouse and Human Immunology
Mestas, J., & Hughes, C. C. W. (2004) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2731 · Cited by 3,822
Immune surveillance by the liver
Jenne, C. N., & Kubes, P. (2013) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2691 · Cited by 1,047
The Effects of Secretory IgA in the Mucosal Immune System
Li, Y., Jin, L., & Chen, T. (2020) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2020/2032057 · Cited by 336
Rethinking mucosal antibody responses: IgM, IgG and IgD join IgA
Chen, K., Magri, G., Grasset, E. K., & Cerutti, A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0261-1 · Cited by 336
Ben Mkaddem, S., Benhamou, M., & Monteiro, R. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00811 · Cited by 283
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Monteiro, R. C., & van de Winkel, J. G. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Immunology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-204
- ISSN
- 0732-0582 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3278
- OpenAlex
- W2167945713
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IgA Fc Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141011
- The paper
- Monteiro, R. C., & van de Winkel, J. G. J. (2003). IgA Fc Receptors. Annual Review of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.