The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BIODIVERSITY AS A SOURCE OF INNOVATION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Abstract
The object of this article is to draw attention to the significance of microbial diversity as a major resource for biotechnological products and processes. The topic is approached from two complementary standpoints. First, an attempt is made to assess the extent of biodiversity, particularly microbial diversity. In this context, the application of the modern techniques of molecular biology is enabling the detection of hitherto completely unknown groups of microbes and, also, is revealing the extent of genetic diversity within microbial taxa. The case is made for the establishment of sound microbial taxonomies both on the basis of satisfying fundamental scientific needs, and for designing effective isolation strategies. The impact of an ecological approach to search and discovery of novel organisms and properties also is emphasized and illustrated. Second, the question of screening a collection of appropriate microorganisms for the desired attributes is considered. The focus here is placed on modern intelligent or targeted screening, and on the power of molecular biology to extend the range of screening options. Discussions of microbial ecology or diversity only rarely touch upon questions of gene pool conservation. The point made here is that loss of biodiversity should be as ominous for microbiologists and biotechnologists as it is to conservationists. The article concludes with thoughts on some means of conserving microbial diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Cited by
A Molecular View of Microbial Diversity and the Biosphere
Pace, N. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5313.734 · Cited by 2,746
Bergé, J.-P., & Barnathan, G. (2005) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/b135782 · Cited by 401
Buzzini, P., & Martini, A. (2002) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01783.x · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Bull, A. T., Goodfellow, M., & Slater, J. H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-246
- ISSN
- 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3251
- OpenAlex
- W2176166778
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BIODIVERSITY AS A SOURCE OF INNOVATION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.001251
- The paper
- Bull, A. T., Goodfellow, M., & Slater, J. H. (1992). BIODIVERSITY AS A SOURCE OF INNOVATION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY. Annual Review of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.001251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.