The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS OF THE ACTINOMYCETES
Abstract
Sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA have provided actinomycetologists with a phylogenetic tree that allows the investigation of the evolution of actinomycetes and also provides a basis for classification. The origin of actinomycetes and, except for bifidobacteria, the order by which the main sublines evolved, cannot yet be determined with certainty. However, calibration of rRNA sequence divergence with palaeochemical data, and previously published substitution rates of endosymbiotic bacteria, suggest that the main radiation occurred less than 1 billion years ago. Within this radiation, several phylogenetically homogeneous, but sometimes phenotypically heterogeneous, clades appear to have diverged over a short evolutionary period. The resolution of the 16S rRNA molecule appears to be insufficient to clearly determine the branching patterns between clades in this area of the phylogenetic tree. The distribution of some morphological and chemotaxonomic traits such as types of peptidoglycan, menaquinone, phospholipids, cell wall sugars, and fatty acids facilitate the phenotypic delineation of genera within each clade. At higher taxonomic levels, e.g. at the family level, phenotypic similarities are unpredictable and tend to be less conserved. With the exception of mycolic acids, most traits are polyphyletic--hence they are unreliable indicators per se of phylogenetic relationships. Nevertheless, combinations of phenotypic properties are invaluable for predicting whether a new organism is likely to be a member of an established or a novel taxon. Current knowledge about the phylogenetic structure of the actinomycetes provides not only a sound basis for future taxonomic work but also a framework for the rational exploration of their ecology and biotechnological potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antibiotics: past, present and future
Hutchings, M. I., Truman, A. W., & Wilkinson, B. (2019) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.008 · Cited by 2,370
Genetic Dissection of Immunity to Mycobacteria: The Human Model
Casanova, J.-L., & Abel, L. (2002) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.081501.125851 · Cited by 991
Widespread and Persistent Populations of a Major New Marine Actinomycete Taxon in Ocean Sediments
Mincer, T. J., Jensen, P. R., Kauffman, C. A., & Fenical, W. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.10.5005-5011.2002 · Cited by 587
Dhiman, R. K., Mahapatra, S., Slayden, R. A., Boyne, M. E., Lenaerts, A., Hinshaw, J. C., Angala, S. K., Chatterjee, D., Biswas, K., Narayanasamy, P., et al. (2009) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06625.x · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Embley, T. M., & Stackebrandt, E.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 257-289
- ISSN
- 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3251
- OpenAlex
- W2132195303
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS OF THE ACTINOMYCETES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.001353
- The paper
- Embley, T. M., & Stackebrandt, E. (1994). THE MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS OF THE ACTINOMYCETES. Annual Review of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.001353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.