The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PEPTIDES AS WEAPONS AGAINST MICROORGANISMS IN THE CHEMICAL DEFENSE SYSTEM OF VERTEBRATES
Abstract
The innate immunity of vertebrates to microbial invasion is arbitrated by a network of host-defense mechanisms involving both the long-lasting highly specific responses of the cell-mediated immune system and a nonspecific chemical defense system based on a series of broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides that are analogous to those found in insects. Vertebrate antibiotic peptides secreted by nonlymphoid cells of the mucosal surfaces of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts as well as by the granular glands of the skin reportedly cause the lysis of numerous pathogenic microorganisms, including viruses, gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, protozoa, yeasts, and fungi, as well as of cancer cells. Antimicrobial peptides isolated from vertebrates have three characteristic properties: They are relatively small (20-46 amino acid residues), basic (lysine- or arginine-rich), and amphipathic. Although these peptides differ widely in length and amino acid sequences, they may be grouped in four broad families based on characteristic structural features. Although the precise mechanism of action of these peptides remains to be defined, their microbicidal effect very likely results from their capacity to form channels or pores within the microbial membrane in order to permeate the cell and impair its ability to carry out anabolic processes. This secondary, chemical immune system provides vertebrates with a repertoire of small peptides that are promptly synthesized upon induction, easily stored in large amounts, and readily available for antimicrobial warfare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amphipathic, α-helical antimicrobial peptides
Tossi, A., Sandri, L., & Giangaspero, A. (2000) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/1097-0282(2000)55:1<4::aid-bip30>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 1,247
Antimicrobial Peptides from Plants
Broekaert, W. F., Cammue, B. P. A., De Bolle, M. F. C., Thevissen, K., De Samblanx, G. W., Osborn, R. W., & Nielson, K. (1997) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689709701952 · Cited by 678
Protegrin-1: a broad-spectrum, rapidly microbicidal peptide with in vivo activity
Steinberg, D. A., Hurst, M. A., Fujii, C. A., Kung, A. H., Ho, J. F., Cheng, F. C., Loury, D. J., & Fiddes, J. C. (1997) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.41.8.1738 · Cited by 384
Beyond phytohaemagglutinin: assessing vertebrate immune function across ecological contexts
Demas, G. E., Zysling, D. A., Beechler, B. R., Muehlenbein, M. P., & French, S. S. (2011) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01813.x · Cited by 334
Vanhoye, D., Bruston, F., Nicolas, P., & Amiche, M. (2003) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03584.x · Cited by 274
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolas, P., & Mor, A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 277-304
- ISSN
- 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3251
- OpenAlex
- W2168519444
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PEPTIDES AS WEAPONS AGAINST MICROORGANISMS IN THE CHEMICAL DEFENSE SYSTEM OF VERTEBRATES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.001425
- The paper
- Nicolas, P., & Mor, A. (1995). PEPTIDES AS WEAPONS AGAINST MICROORGANISMS IN THE CHEMICAL DEFENSE SYSTEM OF VERTEBRATES. Annual Review of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.001425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.