The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assembly and Function of Type III Secretory Systems
Abstract
▪ Abstract Type III secretion systems allow Yersinia spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Bordetella spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adhering at the surface of a eukaryotic cell to inject bacterial proteins across the two bacterial membranes and the eukaryotic cell membrane to destroy or subvert the target cell. These systems consist of a secretion apparatus, made of ∼25 proteins, and an array of proteins released by this apparatus. Some of these released proteins are “effectors,” which are delivered into the cytosol of the target cell, whereas the others are “translocators,” which help the effectors to cross the membrane of the eukaryotic cell. Most of the effectors act on the cytoskeleton or on intracellular-signaling cascades. A protein injected by the enteropathogenic E. coli serves as a membrane receptor for the docking of the bacterium itself at the surface of the cell. Type III secretion systems also occur in plant pathogens where they are involved both in causing disease in susceptible hosts and in eliciting the so-called hypersensitive response in resistant or nonhost plants. They consist of 15–20 Hrp proteins building a secretion apparatus and two groups of effectors: harpins and avirulence proteins. Harpins are presumably secreted in the extracellular compartment, whereas avirulence proteins are thought to be targeted into plant cells. Although a coherent picture is clearly emerging, basic questions remain to be answered. In particular, little is known about how the type III apparatus fits together to deliver proteins in animal cells. It is even more mysterious for plant cells where a thick wall has to be crossed. In spite of these haunting questions, type III secretion appears as a fascinating trans-kingdom communication device.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited
Nikaido, H. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.4.593-656.2003 · Cited by 4,316
The biology and future prospects of antivirulence therapies
Cegelski, L., Marshall, G. R., Eldridge, G. R., & Hultgren, S. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1818 · Cited by 788
Pathogenicity Islands in BacterialPathogenesis
Schmidt, H., & Hensel, M. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.1.14-56.2004 · Cited by 776
Recombinant protein secretion in Escherichia coli
Mergulhão, F. J. M., Summers, D. K., & Monteiro, G. A. (2005) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.11.003 · Cited by 485
Yao, Y., Xie, Y., & Kim, K. S. (2006) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.74.4.2196-2206.2006 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornelis, G. R., & Van Gijsegem, F.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 735-774
- ISSN
- 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3251
- OpenAlex
- W2122351989
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.