Cited by 273Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The neurobiology of individual differences in complex behavioral traits

Open access
Hariri, Ahmad R.·2009·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

Neuroimaging, especially BOLD fMRI, has begun to identify how variability in brain function contributes to individual differences in complex behavioral traits. In parallel, pharmacological fMRI and multimodal PET/fMRI are identifying how variability in molecular signaling pathways influences individual differences in brain function. Against this background, functional genetic polymorphisms are being utilized to understand the origins of variability in signaling pathways as well as to model efficiently how such emergent variability impacts behaviorally relevant brain function. This article provides an overview of a research strategy seeking to integrate these complementary technologies and utilizes existing empirical data to illustrate its effectiveness in illuminating the neurobiology of individual differences in complex behavioral traits. The article also discusses how such efforts can contribute to the identification of predictive markers that interact with environmental factors to precipitate disease and to develop more effective and individually tailored treatment regimes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135335

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The right amygdala plays a specific role in processing angry and fearful facial expressions.

    “The finding of stronger reac vity in the right amygdala is in line with previous work showing stronger role of the right hemisphere in processing faces and sugges ons that the right amygdala plays a specific role in the processing of angry and fearful facial expressions [36, 55, 56].”

    From Amygdala Reactivity, Antidepressant Discontinuation, and Relapse (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

    The section “Trait Anxiety, the Amygdala, and Serotonin” reports amygdala responses to angry and fearful facial expressions. It does not identify a specific role for the right amygdala or establish a right-hemisphere advantage in face processing. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The right hemisphere has a stronger role in processing faces.

    “The finding of stronger reac vity in the right amygdala is in line with previous work showing stronger role of the right hemisphere in processing faces and sugges ons that the right amygdala plays a specific role in the processing of angry and fearful facial expressions [36, 55, 56].”

    From Amygdala Reactivity, Antidepressant Discontinuation, and Relapse (2024) · cites this paper as [56]

    The section “Trait Anxiety, the Amygdala, and Serotonin” says the amygdala responds to emotional facial expressions, but it does not compare the right and left hemispheres. Searches for right-hemisphere face processing and amygdala lateralization found no passage establishing a stronger role for the right hemisphere; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Structural and functional brain indices may be sufficiently stable within and across developmental periods to warrant treatment as susceptibility factors.

    “Finally, structural and functional brain indices may be sufficiently stable within and across developmental periods (Caceres et al., 2009, Forbes et al., 2009, Hariri, 2009, Johnstone et al., 2005, Manuck et al., 2007, Miller et al., 2002, Miller et al., 2009, Wu et al., 2014, Zuo et al., 2010) to warrant treatment as susceptibility factors.”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Hariri, 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 122 · Cited by 273

Authors
Hariri, A. R.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Hariri, Ahmad R.
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
225-247
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2110601854
Cited by
273
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 37
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH072837)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
individual differences, pharmacological fMRI, molecular pathways, predictive biomarkers, personalized treatment, neurobiology of behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuropsychology, Genetic Variation, Biomarkers, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review