The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glauber Modeling in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions
Open accessAbstract
We review the theoretical background, experimental techniques, and phenomenology of what is known in relativistic heavy ion physics as the Glauber model, which is used to calculate geometric quantities. A brief history of the original Glauber model is presented, with emphasis on its development into the purely classical, geometric picture used for present-day data analyses. Distinctions are made between the optical limit and Monte Carlo approaches, which are often used interchangeably but have some essential differences in particular contexts. The methods used by the four RHIC experiments are compared and contrasted, although the end results are reassuringly similar for the various geometric observables. Finally, several important RHIC measurements are highlighted that rely on geometric quantities, estimated from Glauber calculations, to draw insight from experimental observables. The status and future of Glauber modeling in the next generation of heavy ion physics studies is briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adcox, K., Adler, S. S., Afanasiev, S., Aidala, C., Ajitanand, N. N., Akiba, Y., Al-Jamel, A., Alexander, J., Amirikas, R., Aoki, K., et al. (2005) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086 · Cited by 3,025
Self-citationJ/ψ suppression by quark-gluon plasma formation
Matsui, T., & Satz, H. (1986) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91404-8 · Cited by 2,912
hijing: A Monte Carlo model for multiple jet production in pp , pA , and AA collisions
Wang, X.-N., & Gyulassy, M. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.44.3501 · Cited by 1,647
Cited by
Nearly perfect fluidity: from cold atomic gases to hot quark gluon plasmas
Schäfer, T., & Teaney, D. (2009) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126001 · Cited by 438
Small System Collectivity in Relativistic Hadronic and Nuclear Collisions
Nagle, J. L., & Zajc, W. A. (2018) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101916-123209 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, M. L., Reygers, K., Sanders, S. J., & Steinberg, P.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-243
- ISSN
- 0163-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4134
- OpenAlex
- W2147968749
- Cited by
- 1,553
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glauber Modeling in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020
- The paper
- Miller, M. L., Reygers, K., Sanders, S. J., & Steinberg, P. (2007). Glauber Modeling in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.