Nutrition, epigenetics, and developmental plasticity: implications for understanding human disease
Abstract
There is considerable evidence for induction of differential risk of noncommunicable diseases in humans by variation in the quality of the early life environment. Studies in animal models show that induction and stability of induced changes in the phenotype of the offspring involve altered epigenetic regulation by DNA methylation and covalent modifications of histones. These findings indicate that such epigenetic changes are highly gene specific and function at the level of individual CpG dinucleotides. Interventions using supplementation with folic acid or methyl donors during pregnancy, or folic acid after weaning, alter the phenotype and epigenotype induced by maternal dietary constraint during gestation. This suggests a possible means for reducing risk of induced noncommunicable disease, although the design and conduct of such interventions may require caution. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in understanding the mechanism that underlies the early life origins of disease and to place these studies in a broader life-course context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These effects may be mediated by the regulation of gene expression through chromatin modification or DNA methylation (epigenetics) because of intrauterine or early childhood exposures rather than changes in genotypes.
“These effects may be meditated by the regulation of gene expression through chromatin modification or DNA methylation (epigenetics) because of intrauterine or early childhood exposures rather than changes in genotypes (53).”
From Globalization of Diabetes (2011) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 164 · Cited by 372
- Authors
- Burdge, G. C., & Lillycrop, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 315-339
- ISSN
- 0199-9885 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4312
- OpenAlex
- W2089111792
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fordham University
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Keywords
- developmental origins of health and disease, epigenetics, DNA methylation, histone modifications, early life environment, maternal nutrition, folic acid supplementation, methyl donors, non-communicable diseases, developmental plasticity, life course, CpG
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Female, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Epigenesis, Genetic, Fetal Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review