The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensitivity Analysis in Chemical Kinetics
Abstract
Complex mathematical models are increasingly being used as predictive tools and as aids for understanding the processes underlying observed chemical phenomena. The parameters appearing in these models, which may include rate constants, activation energies, thermodynamic constants, transport coefficients, initial conditions, and operating conditions, are seldom known to high precision. Thus, the predictions or conclusions of modeling endeavors are usually subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, regardless of uncertainty questions, there is always the overriding matter of which parameters control laboratory observations. Quantification of the role of the parameters in the model predictions is the traditional realm of sensitivity analysis. A significant amount of current research is directed at conceptualization and implementation of numerical techniques for determining parametric sensitivities for algebraic, differential, and partial differential equation models including those with stochastic character and nonconstant parameters. Recent studies have also served to extend the range of the conventional parametric analysis to address new questions, relevant to the process of model building and interpretation. This review attempts to present a full range of results and applications of sensitivity analysis, relevant to chemical kinetic modeling. We exclude a large class of literature that deals with system sensitivities from a control theory perspective (1). We further limit discussion of related subjects such as parameter identification (estimation of best parameter values for fitting data) and optimization, in which parametric sensitivities play only
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems
Helton, J. C., & Davis, F. J. (2003) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00058-9 · Cited by 2,688
Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications
Tur�nyi, T. (1990) · Journal of Mathematical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/bf01166355 · Cited by 572
Sensitivity analysis of initial value problems with mixed odes and algebraic equations
Caracotsios, M., & Stewart, W. E. (1985) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0098-1354(85)85014-6 · Cited by 411
Helton, J. C., Davis, F. J., & Johnson, J. D. (2005) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2004.09.006 · Cited by 278
Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment and model selection
Cannavó, F. (2012) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.008 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Rabitz, H., Kramer, M., & Dacol, D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1983-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 419-461
- ISSN
- 0066-426X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1593
- OpenAlex
- W2158734140
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity Analysis in Chemical Kinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pc.34.100183.002223
- The paper
- Rabitz, H., Kramer, M., & Dacol, D. (1983). Sensitivity Analysis in Chemical Kinetics. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.34.100183.002223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.