The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energetics and Mechanics of Terrestrial Locomotion
Abstract
This review addresses a simple question: How do muscles use the energy they consume during terrestrial locomotion? Using a comparative approach, it was found that the mass-specific rate of metabolic energy consumption changes by more than ten-fold with body size, while the mass-specific rate at which the muscles performed mechanical work did not change at all. It was also found that the rate of metabolic energy consumption increased linearly with speed, while the rate at which muscles performed mechanical work increased curvilinearly with speed (oc V1.53). We conclude from these observations that the rate at which animals consume metabolic energy during terrestrial locomotion is not determined by the rate at which their muscles perform mechanical work. Instead, the metabolic cost of generating muscular force over time (integral of F dt) appears to determine the metabolic cost of terrestrial locomotion. The cost of generating force increases with increasing speed and decreases with increasing body size in exactly the same manner as cost of locomotion. It is suggested that the metabolic cost of generating muscular force may be determined by the intrinsic velocity of shortening (i.e proportional to rates at which the cross-bridges between actin and myosin cycle) of the muscle motor units that are active during locomotion. Faster motor units are used both as animals increase speed and in equivalent muscles of smaller animals moving at the same speed. This suggestion is testable and future studies should determine whether or not it explains the higher costs of generating muscular force with increasing speed and decreasing body size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles.
Close, R. I. (1972) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129 · Cited by 1,890
Cited by
Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners
Saunders, P. U., Pyne, D. B., Telford, R. D., & Hawley, J. A. (2004) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200434070-00005 · Cited by 975
Motor Patterns in Human Walking and Running
Cappellini, G., Ivanenko, Y. P., Poppele, R. E., & Lacquaniti, F. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00081.2006 · Cited by 798
Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk.
Parker, K. L., Robbins, C. T., & Hanley, T. A. (1984) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801180 · Cited by 577
Running economy: Measurement, norms, and determining factors
Barnes, K. R., & Kilding, A. E. (2015) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-015-0007-y · Cited by 465
The natural history of human gait and posture
Lovejoy, C. O. (2005) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.001 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, C. R., & Heglund, N. C.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Physiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1982-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-107
- ISSN
- 0066-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1585
- OpenAlex
- W2177963291
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energetics and Mechanics of Terrestrial Locomotion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.ph.44.030182.000525
- The paper
- Taylor, C. R., & Heglund, N. C. (1982). Energetics and Mechanics of Terrestrial Locomotion. Annual Review of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.44.030182.000525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.