The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug Efficacy at G Protein–Coupled Receptors
Abstract
Efficacy has been defined in receptor pharmacology as a proportionality factor denoting the amount of physiological response a given ligand imparts to a biological system for a given amount of receptor occupancy. While first defined in terms of response, the concept can be expanded to a wide variety of G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) behaviors, which includes pleiotropic interaction with multiple G proteins, internalization, oligomerization, desensitization, and interaction with membrane auxilliary proteins. Thus, there can be numerous types of efficacy, and different ligands can have a range of efficacies for different receptor behaviors. This review discusses the use of the efficacy concept in GPCR models based on the thermodynamic linkage theory and also in terms of the protein ensemble theory, in which macroaffinity of ligands for an ensemble of receptor microstates produces a new ligand-bound ensemble. The pharmacological characteristics of the ligand emerge from the intersection of the ligand-bound ensemble with the various ensembles defining pharmacological receptor behaviors. Receptor behaviors discussed are activation of G proteins; ability to be phosphorylated, desensitized, and internalized; formation of dimers and oligomers; and the interaction with auxiliary membrane and cytosolic proteins. The concepts of ligand-specific receptor conformation and conditional efficacy are also discussed in the context of ligand control of physiological response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAMPs regulate the transport and ligand specificity of the calcitonin-receptor-like receptor
McLatchie, L. M., Fraser, N. J., Main, M. J., Wise, A., Brown, J., Thompson, N., Solari, R., Lee, M. G., & Foord, S. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30666 · Cited by 2,134
Christopoulos, G., Perry, K. J., Morfis, M., Tilakaratne, N., Gao, Y., Fraser, N. J., Main, M. J., Foord, S. M., & Sexton, P. M. (1999) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.56.1.235 · Cited by 486
Armour, S. L., Foord, S., Kenakin, T., & Chen, W.-J. (1999) · Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods · doi:10.1016/s1056-8719(00)00074-5 · Cited by 96
Self-citation
Cited by
González-Maeso, J., Weisstaub, N. V., Zhou, M., Chan, P., Ivic, L., Ang, R., Lira, A., Bradley-Moore, M., Ge, Y., Zhou, Q., et al. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.008 · Cited by 925
Kenakin, T., & Miller, L. J. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.108.000992 · Cited by 573
Self-citationThe selectivity of β‐adrenoceptor antagonists at the human β 1, β 2 and β 3 adrenoceptors
Baker, J. G. (2005) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706048 · Cited by 537
Tachykinins and tachykinin receptors: a growing family
Pennefather, J. N., Lecci, A., Candenas, M. L., Patak, E., Pinto, F. M., & Maggi, C. A. (2004) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.039 · Cited by 473
Beyond Desensitization: Physiological Relevance of Arrestin-Dependent Signaling
Luttrell, L. M., Gesty-Palmer, D., & Sibley, D. R. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.002436 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenakin, T.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 349-379
- ISSN
- 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4304
- OpenAlex
- W2110470644
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug Efficacy at G Protein–Coupled Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.42.091401.113012
- The paper
- Kenakin, T. (2002). Drug Efficacy at G Protein–Coupled Receptors. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.42.091401.113012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.