The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
T HE E VOLUTION OF A SEXUAL F UNGI: Reproduction, Speciation and Classification
Abstract
▪ Abstract Phylogenetic and population genetic methods that compare nucleic acid variation are being used to identify species and populations of pathogenic fungi and determine how they reproduce in nature. These studies show that asexual or sexual reproductive morphology does not necessarily correlate with clonal or recombining reproductive behavior, and that fungi with all types of reproductive morphologies and behaviors can be accommodated by a phylogenetic species concept. Although approximately one fifth of described fungi have been thought to be asexual and clonal, recent studies have shown that they are also recombining. Whether a particular pathogen reproduces clonally or by recombination depends on factors relating to its biology and its distribution in space and time. Knowing the identity of species and populations and their reproductive modes, while taking a broad view of pathogen behavior in space and time, should enhance the ability of pathologists to control pathogens and even predict their behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, J. M., Smith, N. H., O'Rourke, M., & Spratt, B. G. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384 · Cited by 1,802
MULTILOCUS STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF HORDEUM SPONTANEUM
Brown, A. H. D., Feldman, M. W., & Nevo, E. (1980) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/96.2.523 · Cited by 643
Cited by
Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse?
Arnold, A. E., Maynard, Z., Gilbert, G. S., Coley, P. D., & Kursar, T. A. (2000) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00159.x · Cited by 837
Evidence for Sexuality in the Opportunistic Fungal Pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus
Paoletti, M., Rydholm, C., Schwier, E. U., Anderson, M. J., Szakacs, G., Lutzoni, F., Debeaupuis, J.-P., Latgé, J.-P., Denning, D. W., & Dyer, P. S. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.045 · Cited by 308
CRYPTIC SPECIATION IN THE COSMOPOLITAN AND CLONAL HUMAN PATHOGENIC FUNGUS ASPERGILLUS FUMIGATUS
Pringle, A., Baker, D. M., Platt, J. L., Wares, J. P., Latgé, J. P., & Taylor, J. W. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01059.x · Cited by 267
Self-citationGuerber, J. C., Liu, B., Correll, J. C., & Johnston, P. R. (2003) · Mycologia · doi:10.1080/15572536.2004.11833047 · Cited by 265
Sexual development and cryptic sexuality in fungi: insights from Aspergillus species
Dyer, P. S., & O'Gorman, C. M. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00308.x · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, J., Jacobson, D., & Fisher, M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-246
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2115515142
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T HE E VOLUTION OF A SEXUAL F UNGI: Reproduction, Speciation and Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.197
- The paper
- Taylor, J., Jacobson, D., & Fisher, M. (1999). T HE E VOLUTION OF A SEXUAL F UNGI: Reproduction, Speciation and Classification. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
