The DOI matches its Crossref record.
T HE T OMATO–CLADOSPORIUM FULVUM I NTERACTION: A Versatile Experimental System to Study Plant-Pathogen Interactions
Open accessAbstract
▪ Abstract Over the past 20 years, the interaction between the biotrophic fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum and tomato has developed into a versatile experimental system for molecular plant pathology and resistance breeding. This interaction provided the resources for cloning of fungal avirulence genes for the first time and interesting clues on recognition of their extracellular products by tomato, as well as mechanisms employed by the fungus to circumvent this recognition. A wealth of information has become available on the structure and genomic organization of Cf resistance genes. The occurrence of many clustered Cf homologues allows the generation of new genes with additional recognitional specificities by reshuffling. It is anticipated that potentially all proteins secreted by C. fulvum are recognized by one or more individuals in a population of tomato genotypes, a hypothesis that has been experimentally confirmed. The future challenge will be to elucidate the mechanisms of perception of avirulence factors and the subsequent signaling eventually leading to activation of host defense responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Early Signaling Events Induced by Elicitors of Plant Defenses
Garcia-Brugger, A., Lamotte, O., Vandelle, E., Bourque, S., Lecourieux, D., Poinssot, B., Wendehenne, D., & Pugin, A. (2006) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-0711 · Cited by 630
Ma, Z., Song, T., Zhu, L., Ye, W., Wang, Y., Shao, Y., Dong, S., Zhang, Z., Dou, D., Zheng, X., et al. (2015) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.15.00390 · Cited by 434
Rep, M., Van Der Does, H. C., Meijer, M., Van Wijk, R., Houterman, P. M., Dekker, H. L., De Koster, C. G., & Cornelissen, B. J. C. (2004) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04177.x · Cited by 431
Peart, J. R., Lu, R., Sadanandom, A., Malcuit, I., Moffett, P., Brice, D. C., Schauser, L., Jaggard, D. A. W., Xiao, S., Coleman, M. J., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.152330599 · Cited by 422
Krüger, J., Thomas, C. M., Golstein, C., Dixon, M. S., Smoker, M., Tang, S., Mulder, L., & Jones, J. D. G. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069288 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Joosten, M., & de Wit, P.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 335-367
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2135027720
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T HE T OMATO–CLADOSPORIUM FULVUM I NTERACTION: A Versatile Experimental System to Study Plant-Pathogen Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.335
- The paper
- Joosten, M., & de Wit, P. (1999). T HE T OMATO–CLADOSPORIUM FULVUM I NTERACTION: A Versatile Experimental System to Study Plant-Pathogen Interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
