Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 580

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A POMICTIC, P OLYPHAGOUS R OOT-K NOT N EMATODES: Exceptionally Successful and Damaging Biotrophic Root Pathogens

Trudgill, David L., Blok, Vivian C.·2001·Annual Review of Phytopathology

Abstract

▪ Abstract Most apomictic root-knot nematodes (RKN; Meloidogyne spp.) have host ranges that encompass the majority of flowering plants, and M. incognita is possibly the world's most damaging crop pathogen. The ancestors, age, and origins of the polyphagous RKN are obscure, but there is increasing evidence that M. incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria are closely related, heterogeneous species with a recent, hybrid (reticulate) origin. If so, they must owe much of their current worldwide distributions to spread by agriculture. Host resistance appears to be generally durable in the field, but laboratory studies suggest that apomixis does not prevent evolution in response to selection by a parasitic bacterium (Pasteuria penetrans) and host resistance. Maintaining general fitness may be the evolutionary priority for most populations of polyphagous RKN, and a wide host range, important in the field but not in the laboratory, may be conserved by apomixis. Several factors may help confer a wide host range, including suppression of host resistance, perhaps as a consequence of the strength of the induced susceptible response. Resistance genes effective against RKN appear not to have resulted from coevolution. Rates of juvenile invasion and/or development are low in many wild and some crop plants, with the result that they are both poor hosts and sustain less damage. Overall, it is suggested that greater coordination, particularly of fundamental research, is required.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.53

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 580

Metadata

Authors
Trudgill, D. L., & Blok, V. C.
Venue
Annual Review of Phytopathology
Published
2001-09
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
53-77
ISSN
  • 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2107
OpenAlex
W2156940740
Cited by
580
References
22
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A POMICTIC, P OLYPHAGOUS R OOT-K NOT N EMATODES: Exceptionally Successful and Damaging Biotrophic Root Pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.53
The paper
Trudgill, D. L., & Blok, V. C. (2001). A POMICTIC, P OLYPHAGOUS R OOT-K NOT N EMATODES: Exceptionally Successful and Damaging Biotrophic Root Pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.53

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.