The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
T HE E COLOGICAL S IGNIFICANCE OF B IOFILM F ORMATION BY P LANT -A SSOCIATED B ACTERIA
Abstract
▪ Abstract Bacteria associated with plants have been observed frequently to form assemblages referred to as aggregates, microcolonies, symplasmata, or biofilms on leaves and on root surfaces and within intercellular spaces of plant tissues. In a wide range of habitats, biofilms are purported to be microniches of conditions markedly different from those of the ambient environment and drive microbial cells to effect functions not possible alone or outside of biofilms. This review constructs a portrait of how biofilms associated with leaves, roots and within intercellular spaces influence the ecology of the bacteria they harbor and the relationship of bacteria with plants. We also consider how biofilms may enhance airborne dissemination, ubiquity and diversification of plant-associated bacteria and may influence strategies for biological control of plant disease and for assuring food safety. Trapped by a nexus, coordinates uncertain Ever expanding or contracting Cannibalistic and scavenging sorties Excavations through signs of past alliances Consensus signals sound revelry Then time warped by viscosity Genomes showing codependence A virtual microbial beach party With no curfew and no time-out A few estranged cells seeking exit options, Looking for another menagerie. David Sands, Montana State University, Bozeman, February 2003
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Depth Penetration and Detection of pH Gradients in Biofilms by Two-Photon Excitation Microscopy
Vroom, J. M., De Grauw, K. J., Gerritsen, H. C., Bradshaw, D. J., Marsh, P. D., Watson, G. K., Birmingham, J. J., & Allison, C. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.8.3502-3511.1999 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms
Flemming, H.-C., & Wuertz, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9 · Cited by 1,729
Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems
Toju, H., Peay, K. G., Yamamichi, M., Narisawa, K., Hiruma, K., Naito, K., Fukuda, S., Ushio, M., Nakaoka, S., Onoda, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4 · Cited by 1,077
Pöschl, U., & Shiraiwa, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500487s · Cited by 657
Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype
Whipps, J. M., Hand, P., Pink, D., & Bending, G. D. (2008) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03906.x · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, C. E., & Monier, J.-M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Phytopathology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 429-453
- ISSN
- 0066-4286 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2107
- OpenAlex
- W2132719456
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T HE E COLOGICAL S IGNIFICANCE OF B IOFILM F ORMATION BY P LANT -A SSOCIATED B ACTERIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.022103.134521
- The paper
- Morris, C. E., & Monier, J.-M. (2003). T HE E COLOGICAL S IGNIFICANCE OF B IOFILM F ORMATION BY P LANT -A SSOCIATED B ACTERIA. Annual Review of Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.022103.134521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.